《新闻1+1》2012年8月30日完成台本

[News 1 + 1]On August 30, 2012 complete playscript with stage directions

　　北大无小事！

North no small!

　　（导视）

(Guide apparent)

　　字幕提示：

Subtitles hint:

　　院长，漂亮服务员，奸淫。

dean,Beautiful waiter,Commit adultery.

　　解说：

interpretation:

　　九天前，他的微博举报引发舆论一片哗然，九天后，知名学者邹恒甫终于隐约现身。

Nine days before,His small bo report caused a public outcry,After nine days,Famous scholars ZouHengFu finally appeared faintly.

　　邱晨辉中国青年报记者：

High chenhui China youth daily reporter:

　　他看到之后回复了邮件，说我并没有在躲猫猫，我并没有在耍流氓。

After he saw reply mail,Said I don't hide and seek,I don't play rascal.

　　解说：

interpretation:

　　电子邮件给北大提供举报线索，发送资料为媒体提供报道素材。这个声称自己历来大嘴的举报者，此次是否又是有爆无料。

E-mail to provide clues of Peking University report,Send material for media reports provide material.The claim their mouth has always been the prosecutors,Whether the explosion is without material.

　　邱晨辉：

High chenhui:

　　就是没有他自己掌握的证据或者线索，都是其他人发给他的。

Is not he their mastery of the evidence or clues,Are all others to his.

　　解说：

interpretation:

　　我们不能无限期等待下去，随时准备采取进一步行动，是非恩怨的表象后，北大的荣誉需要用实际行动扞卫。

We can't wait indefinitely for it,Ready to take further action,Is the appearance of enemy after,North honor need to use practical actions are guard.

　　《新闻1+1》今日关注：“北大无小事！”。

[News 1 + 1]Attention today:"North no small!".

　　白岩松评论员：

BaiYanSong commentators:

　　你好，观众朋友，欢迎收看正在直播的《新闻1+1》。

hello,Audience friends,Welcome to are live[News 1 + 1].

　　8月21日的时候，一个号称“最牛经济学家”的邹教授，用微博曝光了北大院长、老师们的一些所谓丑事。这件事这些天来可以说吊足了人们的胃口，从法制新闻到教育新闻，从社会新闻到娱乐新闻，都在酝酿，并且放大这条新闻。但是一个非常奇怪的现象是，爆料者邹教授却迟迟没有现身，躲起了猫猫，不过今天他出现了。因为他的出现，事情会发生转机吗？我们一起来看一下。

August 21, when the,A so-called"Most economists"Of professor zou,With micro bo exposure of the Peking University/The teachers some so-called folly.It these days can say appetizing for people's appetite,From the legal news to education news,From the social news to entertainment news,Developing both in,And to enlarge this news.But a very strange phenomenon is,The professor zou blog but can not appeared,Hide up the cat cat,But today he appeared.Because of his presence,Things will happen to transfer?Together we take a look at.

　　解说：

interpretation:

　　漩涡中不见其踪的邹恒甫终于在今天现身了，不过是有限度地现身，他把自己首度对媒体发声的平台选择在了平面媒体，在今天的中青报头版，这样的标题文章，似乎让隔空对话了一个多星期的事件，有了一个重要的推进。

In the vortex of the trace of the ZouHengFu finally come today,But there is a limit to appeared,He put himself to speak first media platform choice in the print media,In today's popular newspaper supplement the front page,The title of this article,Seems to make every empty dialogue was more than a week of events,Have a important propulsion.

　　邱晨辉中国青年报记者：

High chenhui China youth daily reporter:

　　28日我向他发了一封邮件，他没有回，29日我又连发了两封邮件，还是没有回，因为我们29日发了一篇报道，想呼吁邹恒甫现身，并且让他提供证据的报道。他看到之后回复了邮件，他说我看到你们的报道了，但是我并没有在躲猫猫，我并没有在耍流氓，我是有一些证据的。回了大概这样一个邮件，然后我还没有来得及给他回邮件，他电话就打过来了。

28 I to he sent an email,He didn't return,29 I again volleying two mail,Still not back to,Because we 29 hair a report,Would like to appeal to ZouHengFu appeared,And let him to provide evidence of the report.After he saw reply mail,He said that I see your reported,But I am not hide and seek,I don't play rascal,I do have some evidence.Back to the about such a mail,Then I had time to give him back to mail,He telephone dozen come over.

　　解说：

interpretation:

　　有点小心急的邹恒甫和记者取得联系，根据他的说法是希望第三方知道，我的确是在向北大提供一些信息，而他也将给北大提供的线索提供给了中青报记者一份。

A little impatient ZouHengFu and reporters of the contact,According to his statement is to the third party know,I do is to provide some information in Peking University,And he will also have to provide clues to the north is offered to the middle news reporter a.

　　邱晨辉：

High chenhui:

　　邮件的内容我没有征求邹恒甫本人的看法，所以我不便向大家说太多，但是可以说的一点，邮件内容和21号爆料北大院长奸淫服务员，和这个微博爆料是没有关系的。发给北大邮件全部都是其他人提供给邹恒甫本人的线索，换句话说，没有他自己掌握的证据和线索，都是其他人发给他的。

The content of the mail I didn't ask for ZouHengFu my view,So I said too much inconvenience to you,But say little,Mail contents and 21 of the blog north commit adultery,And the micro bo blog there is no relationship.To north mail all others to provide ZouHengFu I clues,In other words,No he their mastery of the evidence and clues,Are all others to his.

　　解说：

interpretation:

　　今天在北大的官方网站关于“邹恒甫微博事件”的第二份声明称，北大已经接到了邹恒甫打来的电话和电子邮件，并肯定了邹恒甫现在的态度才是应有的负责态度，同时也印证了，邹恒甫在电话及电子邮件中均没有举出任何有助于专门调查组进一步开展工作的具体证据。

Today in the north's official website about"ZouHengFu micro bo event"Second statement said,Peking University has received a call from the ZouHengFu telephone and E-mail,And sure the ZouHengFu now attitude is due responsible attitude,At the same time also proved,ZouHengFu in the telephone and E-mail are not adduce any help special investigation team to begin the work further concrete evidence.

　　邱晨辉：

High chenhui:

　　通过跟邹恒甫接触，想向他询问，到底有没有一些直接证据证明他在微博里爆料北大院长奸淫服务员的事情，有没有一些直接的证据。如果真的想把这个爆出猛料，或者揭北大的丑的话，我觉得就是应该尽快地提供一些真正的证据出来，这是一方面，确实在我跟邹恒甫本人电话里的接触，包括邮件里的一些话语，我还能感觉到一点，邹恒甫似乎不太想过早把这个证据拿出来，所以我的感觉他还是期待真正的第三方，而这第三方可能不是媒体，很有可能是他所说的中纪委。

Through contact with ZouHengFu,Want to ask him,Exactly have some direct evidence that he is in micro bo leaks in Peking University dean commit adultery waiter things,Have some direct evidence.If you really want to take this was irreparably,Or the north of ugly words,I think it's as soon as possible should provide some real evidence out,This is on the one hand,Do I tell ZouHengFu I telephone contact,Include some of the words in the mail,I can still feel a bit,ZouHengFu doesn't seem to want to early to take out the evidence,So I feel he is really looking forward to the third party,And the third party may not be media,Very likely is what he said commission for discipline inspection.

　　解说：

interpretation:

　　今天邹恒甫微博举报北大事件已经过去了九天，在新学期开学的忙碌日子里，北大官方网站上高居北大新闻前两位的新闻依然锁定在了邹恒甫身上。在一篇名为“言论当真诚，自由即责任”的评论文章中，更是明确指出，邹恒甫对北大的爆料并不是一种善意、真诚、负责的批评，并不以期望对方查证、推动对方进步为目的，而是唯恐坏事不成真、恶名不昭彰，极力以激烈言论煽动裹胁民意，将整个事件变成一场建立于莫须有证据上的对北大的舆论讨伐。

Today ZouHengFu micro bo report north event has in the past nine days,In the new semester busy days,Peking University web site at Peking University before the news two news still locked in the ZouHengFu body.In a title for"Speech when sincere,Free namely responsibility"Commentary,Is explicitly pointed out that,ZouHengFu pku leaks and is not a bona fide/sincere/Responsible for criticism,Not to expect to verify each other/Promote each other for the purpose of progress,But for fear of bad thing don't come true/Notoriety not fame,Strongly with fierce speech incite forced public opinion,Will the whole event into a established in fabricated evidence of Peking University to the opinion of the crusade against.

　　今天凌晨，原本强势的邹恒甫在微博上的态度似乎稍稍有了改变，他称自己说话往往夸大是一贯的风格，但是这位经济学界的狂人，他的大嘴是否已经超越了界限？引发舆论强烈关注的微博举报，会变成一场闹剧吗？

This morning,Originally strong ZouHengFu in micro bo's attitude seems to be a little has changed,He says his talk they tend to exaggerate is consistent style,But the economic circle of fury,His mouth is beyond the limit?Cause public opinion strong concern micro bo report,Will become a farce?

　　白岩松：

BaiYanSong:

　　首先我们看一下今天他发的这条微博，而且时间是凌晨3：53，这是在哪儿，有时差，还是在国内，还是哪儿。但是我们要把它跟8月21日发的第一条微博，也就是让这件事情真正发酵起来的微博对比来看，可以看一下。8月21日上午9：19分发的，“北大院长在梦桃源北大医疗室吃饭时，只要看到漂亮服务员就必然下手把她们奸淫。北大教授系主任也不例外。所以，梦桃源生意火爆。除了邹恒甫，北大淫棍太多。”这是第一条，到了今天变成了“我笼统地写北大院长系主任教授在梦桃源淫乱当是太夸大了，我当然是指我了解到的少数院长副教授教授如此淫乱。我说话往往夸大，这是我的一贯风格。了解我的都晓得我的这一特点。我痛恨高校腐败者淫乱者，我要大大地为教育神圣呐喊发威”。

First we see today he hair of a micro bo,And time is at 3:53,This is where,Have time,Or in the domestic,Or where.But we have to put it to August 21 hair the first micro bo,Also is to make it real fermentation up micro bo contrast to see,Can see.On August 21 at 9:The distribution of,"Peking University dean in the dream taoyuan north treatment room when having a meal,As long as see beautiful waiter will inevitably be laid hands on him the they commit adultery.Peking University professor dean is no exception.so,Dream taoyuan business is hot.In addition to ZouHengFu,North immoral man too much."This is the first article,Today become"In general I write the dean professor of Peking University in the dream be taoyuan fornication too exaggerated,Of course I mean, I learned a few associate professor dean professor so fornication.I talk often exaggerated,This is my consistent style.Know me know my this characteristic.I hate those within universities fornication,I will greatly for education and sacred punches".

　　可以看到这里会有一些变化，在他的第一个微博里头用的词是奸淫，到了这儿的时候已经变成了淫乱。其实好像程度发生了变化，换一个角度来说，当我看到的时候我觉得这个词更糟糕。为什么呢？如果要在第一个微博里，说到的服务员还是被害者的形象，在他的微博里塑造的，到了这儿的时候，甚至有可能是一种参与者，我觉得对人家的打击是更大的。

Can see there would be some changes,In his first micro bo that word is commit adultery,In here has become a fornication.In fact like level changed,Change a point of view,When I saw when I think of this word worse.why?If you want to in the first micro in bo,Said to the waiter or the image of the victim,In his small bo in shaping,In here,Might even be a participant,I think to the somebody else blow is greater.

　　第一个微博里北大院长教授系主任没有例外，没有少数，到了第二个微博的时候变成了少数，而且认为自己笼统，然后夸大，“我说话往往夸大，这是我的一贯风格，了解我的都晓得我的这一特点。”，我觉得这件事发生之前，绝大多数中国人不了解他的，因此，我们只要去看事实。

The first micro bo in the Peking University professor dean no exception,Not a few,To the second micro bo time into a minority,And that their general,And then exaggerating,"I talk often exaggerated,This is my consistent style,Know me know my this characteristic.",I think it happened before,The vast majority of Chinese people don't understand his,therefore,We just have to go look at the facts.

　　在这里还有两个数据必须观察到，第一个微博如果真的确有证据，将来事态发展，或者是假的，不管怎么着都能看到第一个微博引发的关注是最大的。转发72800，评论19414，但是今天态度发生了转变的微博，不过转发9231，评论3000多，这个差距非常大。

Here there are two data must be observed,The first micro bo if really have evidence,Future developments,Or is false,No matter how wear can see the first micro bo cause attention is the biggest.Forward 72800,Review 19414,But today attitude changed micro bo,But forward 9231,More than 3000 comments,The gap is very large.

　　再来看他发完这个微博之后，一直到今天8点，公众对他云里、雾里曝光的事情相信程度什么样？有点触目惊心。你相信邹恒甫的爆料吗？16981人相信，而不相信的只有326，98%以上的人选择了相信，哪怕爆料没有建立在事实的基础上，我觉得这个数字才是真正这件事情不能简单地过去，而要真正持续关注的重要因素，因为它已经造成了公众对这件事情的相信感。

Will come to see him again after the hair after micro bo,Until 8 o 'clock today,The public in the clouds to him/Mist exposure things believe what degree?A little deceived.Do you believe in ZouHengFu leaks?16981 people believe,And don't believe only 326,More than 98% of people choose to believe in,Even if kept not built on the basis of the facts,I think this number is the real it cannot simply in the past,But to really sustained attention important factors,Because it has caused the public believe that feeling on this matter.

　　同时有另外一个话题，我们必然要谈到，他在跟北大又开始进行沟通，跟监察室沟通，并且说要把我们的沟通让观众知道，我没有躲猫猫。另外提供所谓的证据都是这种描述性的语言，没有可以当成证据来说的。另外，我们看到他爆料所涉及到的内容，公开的微博以及没有公开的一些邮件等等，涉及男女关系、招生腐败、学术腐败、权色交易、学钱勾结、公款吃喝、虚报发票等等，乍一看事真不少，但是能当成证据的又太少。

At the same time there is another topic,We will have to talk about,He began to communicate with Peking University,JianChaShi communication with,And said to put our communication let the audience know,I didn't hide and seek.In addition to provide the evidence is that the descriptive language,No can as evidence of it.In addition,We see he kept the content of the involved,Open micro bo and no open some E-mail and so on,Involves men and women relation/Recruit students corruption/Academic corruption/QuanSe trading/Learn money collusion/Public funds, and did eat and drink/False invoices, etc,At first glance it really many,But can be as the evidence and too little.

　　他的微博发完之后，我们看看《中国青年报》的评论员曹林说的，“这样的认错，真是极具反讽意味”，曹林当成了认错，邹教授是不是认为这是一种认错，还只是一个态度的转变，我觉得要观察。“邹先生一直在微博上号称‘中国经济学第一人’，‘我说话往往夸大’的认错，等于自砸了这块自树的招牌。”一边承认‘我说话夸大’，一边还在说‘我要大大为教育神圣呐喊发威’这是不是夸大其辞呢？仍在现身说法左右互搏、自打耳光。”

His small bo after hair,We see[The China youth daily]CaoLin commentator said,"Such a mistake,Is really extremely irony meaning",CaoLin as a mistake,Professor zou is that this is a mistake,It is only a change of attitude,I think to observe."Mr. Zou has been known in micro blog‘China's economics first’,‘I talk often exaggerated’'s mistake,Since the equal to hit from tree signs."Side admit‘I speak exaggerated’,Side also said in‘I will greatly for education and sacred punches’Is this? Exaggerated?Still in appeared around that mutual stroke/Since a slap in the face."

　　接下来再看看另一位同行，《北京青年报》评论员张天蔚说的，“自从邹恒甫说出‘我说话往往夸大，这是我的一贯风格’之后，他的公共信誉已经大打折扣了，北大也缓过一口气来，开始主动还击。但越是在这样的时候，北大越应该尽快收起胜利者的姿态，踏踏实实地去思考一下。”

The next will see another counterparts,[Beijing youth daily]Commentators ZhangTianWei said,"Since ZouHengFu say‘I talk often exaggerated,This is my consistent style’after,His public reputation have discounted the,Peking University also slow over the breath to,Began to return the initiative.But the more at this time of the season,The Peking University should pack up as soon as possible the attitude of the winner,Builders to think about."

　　既然提到了北大，我们来看一下，邹恒甫通过微博爆料之后，北大的反应又是怎样？又应该怎样呢？

Since mentioned the north,We take a look at,ZouHengFu through the micro bo after blackout,The reaction of Peking University how?And how?

　　解说：

interpretation:

　　邹恒甫微博举报从21号开始到今天，已经过去九天，这期间北大和邹恒甫之间一直处在一个隔空对话的状态，让公众看不到真相，而随着事件的持续发酵，对北大的负面影响也在不断扩大，这九天北大有关部门也在以各种有关方式对事件进行回应。

ZouHengFu micro bo report from 21 to start today,Has in the past nine days,This period between ZouHengFu Peking University and has been in a state of every empty dialogue,Let the public can't see the truth,As events of continuous fermentation,The negative impact of Peking University have been continuously expanded,These nine day north relevant departments have in all kinds of relevant way to respond to events.

　　首先是8月21日，在邹恒甫发出第一条举报微博后，当天晚上北大新闻发言人蒋朗朗就接受媒体采访，称“北大绝无此事。并表示邹恒甫说话极不负责任，让人匪夷所思。”然而对于北大的回应，爆料者邹恒甫并不买账，迅速通过微博回应说，“这事不认真调查，你是没有发言权的，你急于否认是你对北大不负责任”。对此，在事件发生后的第三天，8月23日，北大通过其官方网站对邹恒甫微博所涉及的内容发出了第一份声明。

The first is on August 21,,In ZouHengFu article sent out the first report after micro bo,That evening north news spokesman jiang lang lang will accept media interviews,says"Peking University is not the matter.And said ZouHengFu speak highly responsible,Unimaginably queer letting a person."Yet for north response,Don't tell ZouHengFu who support,Rapid response by micro bo said,"This thing not serious investigation,You are not the voice,You are anxious to deny that is your irresponsible to Peking University".this,After the events in the third day,On August 23,,North through its official web site to ZouHengFu micro bo involved the content made the first statement.

　　声明称：“首先鉴于邹恒甫微博发布的有关信息内容，所涉及到的问题性质是严重的，学校成立了专门工作小组负责处理此事。另外，责成学校纪检监察室立即就邹恒甫微博中所涉及的内容依法依规进行严肃、认真的调查核实。如邹恒甫微博中有关内容属实，学校将坚决依照相关党纪、政纪规定和国家法律，对有关人员严肃处理，绝不姑息。如果该微博涉及内容失实，北大大学将依据有关法律和规定，坚决追究有关人员或机构诋毁、诽谤的法律责任。”

Statement said:"First of all in view of ZouHengFu micro Po release information about the content,The problem relating to property is serious,The school has set up special working group shall be responsible for handling the matter.In addition,Instruct the school discipline inspection JianChaShi immediately ZouHengFu micro bo involved in a serious content in accordance with the rules in accordance with law/Serious investigation to verify.If ZouHengFu micro bo the relevant information is true,The school will be determined in accordance with the relevant discipline/ZhengJi regulations and state laws,To the related personnel serious processing,Never palliative.If the micro bo involved in false content,North university will in accordance with relevant laws and regulations,Resolutely shall be investigated for relevant persons or institutions scandals/Libel law responsibility."

　　声明发布之后，北大纪委监察室成立的调查组还向社会公布了举报电话，并发布信息称，他们对在梦桃源餐厅工作的全部68名工作人员，分别通过单独访谈等方式进行了调查，并于8月27日对外通报了调查进展。

Statement issued after,Peking University discipline inspection commission JianChaShi established investigation team also to the report published by the telephone,And release information says,Their dream in taoyuan restaurant all 68 staff,Via a separate interview, etc respectively were investigated,And in August 27 foreign report it to the investigation progress.

　　2012年8月27日新闻：

On August 27th 2012, news:

　　从已经开展的调查核实工作来看，调查组收到的电子邮件和电话中，没有任何涉及邹恒甫微博所述内容的举报。接受访谈的梦桃源餐厅的全部68位工作人员中，没有任何人反映自己曾遭受到，或者听说有同时曾遭受到邹恒甫微博反映的情况。调查组已经努力与邹恒甫先生取得联系，但都没有成功。因此，调查组无法得到邹恒甫先生提供的具体证据和进一步线索。

From has carried out investigation to verify work to see,Investigation team received E-mail and phone,No ZouHengFu micro bo stated in the content of the report.Accept interview dream taoyuan restaurant all 68 staff,No one reflect he had suffered,Or heard about at the same time had suffered ZouHengFu micro bo reflect the situation.Investigation team has been working hard and ZouHengFu contact Mr,But without success.therefore,Investigation team can't get Mr. ZouHengFu provide concrete evidence of and further clues.

　　解说：

interpretation:

　　邹恒甫为什么不和北大的调查组进行接触？他的微博举报到底有没有证据？昨天北大针对该事件发布了第二份声明，指出已与邹恒甫取得联系，但其在电话及电子邮件中均没有举出任何有助于专门调查组进一步开展工作的具体证据，并表示北京大学以最大耐心再次敦促邹恒甫立即前来专门调查组，就他8月21日微博中所涉及内容提供具体有效的证据。

Why don't ZouHengFu north of the investigation team to contact?His small bo report exactly have evidence?In the event of Peking University yesterday released the second statement,Points out that ZouHengFu has contact,But the telephone and E-mail are not adduce any help special investigation team to begin the work further concrete evidence,And said to the largest Beijing university again urging patience ZouHengFu immediately to special investigation team,Is he on August 21 micro bo involved in the content to provide specific and effective evidence.

　　白岩松：

BaiYanSong:

　　不管北大在躺着或者站着，中枪是毫无疑问的。在这之后反应很快，这是好的，而且勇于去面对，这也是好的，成立调查组进行相关的调查也是好的，但是用特约评论员的方式来进行非常义正词严的回击，不同的人就会有不同的看法。

No matter in Peking University lay or standing,The gun is no doubt about it.After this reaction quickly,This is good,And the courage to face,This is also a good,Investigation was established for related research is good,But with the guest commentators way to hit very speak with justice,Different people can have different views.

　　《中国青年报》的曹林就说“激情澎湃充满气势的‘特约评论员’文章，不仅无助于让北大站在一个道德高地，反而让失了形象的北大又失了分。论公，应该以‘调查组’的官方身份发言，论私，应该以‘个人’的身份进行反驳，而不能以‘特约评论员’这种不公不私、不明不白、半官方半民间的身份批评邹恒甫。”

[The China youth daily]CaoLin said the"Passion surging full of momentum‘Guest commentators’This paper,Not only not let north station in a moral high ground,Instead let lost image of the north and lost points.Theory and,Should be based on‘Investigation team’Official status to speak,Theory private,Should be based on‘personal’Identity to be refuted,And not to‘Guest commentators’This unfair not private/obscure/Semiofficial half folk identity ZouHengFu criticism."

　　接下来这个事情当然没有完，还会继续地去面对，并且公众的期待应该由围观变成更多的真相，并且将来都像邹教授，如果没有证据，并且将来如果证明就是瞎说、大嘴的话，怎么样让人们在一种自由的空间当中，却又要负责任。

Next this thing of course not finish,Also will continue to face,And the public should expect by onlookers into more of the truth,And the future is all like professor zou,If there is no evidence,And in the future if proof is nonsense/Word of mouth,How to let the people in a free space in the middle,Yet to be responsible.

　　另外一方面，北大作为一个如此大的高等学府来说，面对将来还会拥有的事情来说，将怎样更加合理地去回应，这不仅是北大，中国的高校应该通过一个又一个这样的案例给自己上课，寻找到最好的经验。接下来听听熊教授对此事有什么看法。

On the other hand,Peking University as a so much for universities,Facing the future will also have things,How will the more reasonable and to respond,This is not only north,China's universities should through one such case to his class,Looking for the best experience.Then listen to bear professor the matter what view is there.

　　熊丙奇21世纪教育研究院副院长：

XiongBingJi 21st century education institute vice President:

　　有成熟现代大学制度的大学里，对于这种危机的应对有非常规范的程序，如果是学术问题，就按学术规范进行应对；如果是法律问题，就走法律程序进行应对。从目前来看，北大自身进行调查，希望能够做到自证清白是很难的。我觉得如果北大能够对这些事件采取合理的处理方式，并不可能产生对北大的伤害，因为我们讲到了有质疑，那么如果我们有一个合理的机制回应这个质疑，那么澄清这个事实实际上就维护了学校的形象。之所以今天会有这么多的谣言围绕着大学展开，就是因为过去长期以来，我们大学在应对这些谣言的时候，都采取了一种不回应、不调查、不知情，这样的暧昧的态度，最后的结果是自食苦果。

A mature modern university system in the university,For the handling of the crisis is standard procedure,If it is academic problem,As academic norms to fight;If it is legal problems,Walk to the legal procedures.It seems,North their own investigation,Hope to be able to do it since the card innocence is difficult.I think if north to these events take reasonable processing mode,Not possible damage to Peking University,Because we have talked about the question,So if we have a reasonable mechanism response to this question,Then clarify the fact that actually maintain the school image.Is today there will be so many rumors spread around the university,It is because in the past for a long time,Our university in dealing with when these rumours,By adopting a kind of do not respond/Don't survey/Don't know,Such vague attitude,The final result is the throat.

　　白岩松：

BaiYanSong:

　　从8月21日一直到现在，大家在在关注着三拨人的形象，第一个是北京大学作为大学本身的形象，第二个是北大院长、教授们一群人的形象，第三个是邹恒甫个人的形象，但是这三个形象也许很重要，但是在我心目当中不是最重要，最最重要恰恰是在爆料当中梦桃源餐厅的68位工作人员，尤其是其中的姑娘们，为什么？她们的清白非常重要、她们的形象也非常重要，再回到刚才的调查，你相信邹恒甫的爆料吗？98%以上，16981人相信爆料，那么在这样一个相信的过程当中，梦桃源餐厅的工作人员，尤其是那些年轻的姑娘们，她们的形象和声誉就受到了极大的损伤，谁来维护她们的尊严？谁又该来安慰她？我觉得跟北京大学的形象比较起来，这些姑娘们的形象更加重要，为此我们要举起法律这样一个利剑吗？接下来看。

From August 21, until now,Everyone in the focused on three dial the image of the people,The first is the Beijing university as the image of the university itself,The second is the Peking University/Professors are a group of people image,The third is ZouHengFu personal image,But the three image may be important,But in my heart of is not the most important,The most important is the dream of leaks in taoyuan restaurant 68 staff,Especially the girls,why?Their innocence is very important/Their image is also very important,Return to again just investigation,Do you believe in ZouHengFu leaks?More than 98%,16981 people believe that leaks,So in such a believe that process,Dream of the restaurant staff,Especially those young girls,Their image and reputation was great damage,Who will maintain their dignity?Who should come to comfort her?I think with Beijing university compared the image,These girls image is more important,Therefore we want to raise the legal such a sword?The next see.

　　解说：

interpretation:

　　转发72810次，评论19414条。今天邹恒甫8月21日引爆网络的这条微博举报还在继续传播和发酵，同时邹恒甫指向北大的质疑也一直没有停止。今天凌晨点4点多，他再次发布微博写到，“邹恒甫根本不应该在北大里面开店，是通过什么后门关系，你们摸进了免税、减税的北大校门？这些猫腻是我搞财政税收的专家最想质疑的，北大应该是超级学术的北大，它不是超级豪华吃喝的北大。”

Forward 72810 times,Article 19414 comments.Today ZouHengFu August 21 detonating network this article micro bo report continues to spread and fermentation,At the same time ZouHengFu pointing north questions also had not been stopped.This morning point 4 o 'clock,He again release micro bo wrote,"ZouHengFu don't should be in the north it open a shop,What is the relationship between the back door,You touch into the tax exemption/Peking University school of the tax cuts?The issue is I make financial tax experts want to question,Peking University should be super academic north,It's not super luxury, and did eat and drink of Peking University."

　　北大、吃喝、梦桃源、漂亮女服务员、领导干部、奸淫，一个多星期以来，一个实名认证的微博就这样通过一条条的文字，让百年北大的声誉迅速成为舆论焦点，北大到底存不存在这些严重的问题，真真假假、虚虚实实的双方对峙中，真相一直是一片迷雾。早在事件发生最初，针对北大的回应，有评论文章就已经提出，“还是要把保留、追究邹恒甫诋毁或诽谤的权利尽快从保留状态应用起来，让法律来做公正的判决。如果仅仅停留在自说自话的声明层面，恐怕时间长了，网民们就会认为是北大方面心虚了。”还有媒体的评论写到“正因内容涉及北大校风的基本道德底线，而让事情水落石出又不难，我们呼吁北大将对此事的调查提交给纪检及司法部门，由他们做出权威结论。”

north/, and did eat and drink/Dream of/Beautiful waitress/Leading cadres/Commit adultery,More than a week ago,A real name the authentication micro bo so through a text,Let one hundred north reputation quickly become the focus of public opinion,The Peking University does not exist these serious problems,Both real and sham/On both sides of the well in the standoff,The truth is always a cloud.Early in the first event,According to the response of Peking University,Critics have been proposed in this article,"Still want the reserves/Shall be investigated for ZouHengFu libel or slander rights from state reserves as soon as possible into application,Make laws to do fair judgment.If only stay in a statement from speaking level,I'm afraid for a long time,People will think it's a north aspects a guilty conscience."And criticism of the media wrote"Because content involves north school spirit's basic moral bottom line,And let things come out in the wash and easy,We appeal to Peking University on this matter will be submitted to the investigation of discipline inspection and judicial departments,By their authority to make the conclusion."

　　今天当双方不再隔空对话，事件似乎有了缓慢的推进，但大家仍然对于事件何时能有一个定论无从推测，先看看邹恒甫的反应。他在其微博上发布的“我只跟中纪委谈”的言论，被媒体解读为赌上了与北大正面交锋的机会，但是最新的消息是，邹恒甫没有去找中纪委，而是选择了联系北大，这一举动被很多人认为有妥协的意味，也和他之前强硬的态度有着天壤之别。而另一方面反观北大，今天的第二份声明也引发了人们的联想，鉴于该事件性质和后果的严重性，我们不能无限期等待下去，随时准备采取进一步行动。进一步的行动会是什么？何时采取进一步的行动，会是得到关注的司法途径吗？而司法途径又究竟能不能解决问题？解决到何种程度？事件似乎才刚刚开始。

Today, when both sides no longer every empty dialogue,Events seem to be a slow propulsion,But you still for events when can have a conclusion that have no way,See first ZouHengFu reaction.He released on the micro bo"I only talk about with the commission for discipline inspection"comments,By the media for interpretation on it with the chance of confrontation,But the latest news is,ZouHengFu didn't go to look for the commission for discipline inspection,But chose the contact north,The move is a lot of people think it is compromise means,And he had a strong attitude are worlds apart.And on the other hand in Peking University,Today's second statement also sparked people's association,In view of the nature of the event and the seriousness of consequences,We can't wait indefinitely for it,Ready to take further action.Further action will be what is it?When to take further action,Is getting attention judicial way?And the judicial way on earth and can not solve the problem?To what extent solve?Events seem to is just beginning.