悲剧就是把美好的东西撕碎给人看，此言不虚。一个留守儿童，好不容易与父母团聚，它本该续上温馨结局。没料到，却是悲剧收场在“爱的致命伤”下，她的生命画上句号，“狼爸”也身陷囹圄。而罪魁，就指向着“体罚教育”。

The tragedy is the good things of the torn to pieces to see,This virtual.A left-behind children,Very not easy reunited with their parents,It was supposed to add sweet ending.Didn't expect,Tragedy is in"Love the trauma"under,Her life picture full stop,"The Wolf dad"Also in jail.And the,It points to"Corporal punishment education".

　　或许，体罚总会披着“爱之切”的外衣：对“狼爸”张某而言，伤害爱女，非其本意；丧女之痛，也始料未及。只是，“追悔”无法改写结局，他只能吞下自酿的苦酒。

perhaps,The corporal punishment will always covered with"Love cut"coat:to"The Wolf dad"Zhang in,Damage daughter,Not its original idea;The pain of loss of female,Also did not expect.just,"afterthoughts"Unable to rewrite the end,He can only swallow home-brewed cup.

　　虐女致死，虽是个案，却不乏深意：当施暴成了“狼爸”的代名词，“狼爸”难免裹上了贬义色彩。“狼爸”是狼还是爸，令人生疑。

Abuse female lethal,Even though it was a case,But profound thering is no lack of:When the violence was"The Wolf dad"The pronoun of,"The Wolf dad"Hard to avoid wrapped in derogatory sense colour."The Wolf dad"Is Wolf or dad,suspect.

　　前不久，“虎妈”“狼爸”相继走红，也引发舆论热议。就拿“狼爸”萧百佑来说，他信奉“三天一顿打，孩子进北大”，用鸡毛掸子将孩子全都“打进名校”。这番教育“神话”，引起人们思忖：体罚教育，到底好不好？从表象上看，“狼爸”的成功，是极具感召力的“望子成龙”，不正是父母们的共同期许么？

Not long ago,"Tiger mother""The Wolf dad"Successively rising,Also cause public opinion of hot debate.take"The Wolf dad"Hsiao the estimates for,He believed in"Three days play's,The child into the north",With feather duster will all children"Into school".This "education"myth",Cause people to contemplate:Corporal punishment education,Really good?Look from the representation,"The Wolf dad"success,Is extremely potent"Used to",Wasn't it parents common expectations yao?

　　然而，“棍棒之下出人才”，终究是个绚烂却不经一戳的泡沫。当过分管教、乃至虐待，成了教育者的“法术”，只会栽下悲剧的种子。而虐女悲剧，就是印证。

however,"Under the sticks out of the talents",After all is a gorgeous but without a stab of foam.When too much discipline/And even abuse,Become educators of"spell",Will only planted the seeds of the tragedy.Abuse and female tragedy,Is confirm.

　　教育，无可避免会挟带着说教、磨砺，但就算是为了孩子好，也应拿捏好分寸，避免用力过度。若将“不打不成器”“爱之深，责之深”奉若信条，那么，爱可能变成孩子不能承受之重。动辄拾起棍棒，会对孩子造成肉体伤害、精神施暴。

education,Inevitably across the sermon/honed,But it is good for children,Should also hold good discretion,Avoid overexert.if"Spare the rod and spoil the child""Love deep,Against deep"Receive if creed,so,Love can become children can't bear the heavy.Easily picked up sticks,The children cause physical damage/Mental violence.

　　“狼爸”张某，也许是无心之失：他文化程度不高，未必有“尊重孩子个性”的教育理性。可其悲剧性的走向，却异常沉重：孩子夭折，已无可救赎，成了他终生的渊薮。

"The Wolf dad"zhang,Maybe a loss:He do not have a high level of culture,May not have"Respect children personality"Education of rational.But its tragic trend,Is unusually heavy:Children die,Already beyond redemption,He became the origin of life.

　　“狼爸”式教育的蛊惑性，就在于其“速效”：看起来，它能砥砺孩子意志，将其打造成“标准零件”。可实质上，它却扼杀孩子个性，也在滋养其奴性。

"The Wolf dad"Type education misleading,Lies in its"loading":looks,It can encourage the child will,Made it into the cause"Standard parts".But in essence,It is kill the child personality,Also in the nourish its servility.

　　鲁迅就曾批判不少人“以为父子关系，只须‘父兮生我’一件事，幼者的全部，便应为长者所有。尤其堕落的，是因此责望报偿，以为幼者的全部，理该做长者的牺牲”，而主张顺应孩子天性，塑造其独立人格。

Lu xun has critical many people"Thought the parent-child relationship,just‘Father xi born I’One thing,Young person all,He should be all the elderly.Especially degraded,Because at the reward,Think of all the younger ones,Supposed to do sacrifice of the elderly",And arguing that conform to the child nature,Shaping its independent personality.

　　归根结底，“狼爸”们是在饮鸩止渴。当野蛮替代了对等尊重，“狼爸”们的成功学，注定是在兜售观念渣滓。评论员佘宗明

In the final analysis,"The Wolf dad"They are in the remedy is worse than the.When the savage substitute for peer respect,"The Wolf dad"The success of their learning,Are doomed to be in selling idea dross.Commentators SheZongMing