20余名京籍人士抗议异地高考 More than 20 name Beijing nationals protest different college entrance examination

　　据《21世纪经济报道》10月19日报道 18日上午9时，20余名家长代表到访北京市教委信访办，希望能约见北京市教委姜沛民主任，就异地高考政策问题进行交流。

According to[The 21st century business herald]On October 19 reports 18, 9 am,More than 20 name on behalf of the Beijing municipal education commission letter is visited do parents visit,Hope to an appointment with the Beijing municipal education commission as JiangPei democracy,The university entrance exam is different policy problems in communication.

　　不到9点钟，北京市教委信访办接待人员到岗后，一位身材高大的京籍青年就带着准备好的材料走进了办公室。

Less than nine o 'clock,The Beijing municipal education commission letter is visited do reception staff to duty after,A tall Beijing youth of cadastral with prepared materials into the office.

　　虽然信访办工作人员不断提醒他，接待时间是自9点开始，但对方仍然按照手头的材料读完，并向信访办工作人员阐述了自己反对“异地高考”的理由。

Although the letter is visited do staff to remind him of his,Reception time is from 9 PM,But the other hand still according to the material after reading,And to the letter is visited do staff expounds his opposition to"Different college entrance examination"reason.

　　在这位京籍人士看来，外地孩子素质极差，打架斗殴带坏了本地小孩。除此之外，外地孩子不断涌入，占用了过多的本地教育资源，“要想享受作为北京人的权利，必须先要承担责任”。

In the Beijing nationals looks,Children from poor quality,Fighting with bad the local children.In addition,Foreign children keep coming,Take up too much local education resources,"If you want to enjoy the rights of as Peking man,Must want to assume responsibility".

　　在互联网上，京籍人士将支持开放异地高考的家长称为“异闹”。明确申明，北京包括教育资源在内的公共资源本来十分充裕，正是因为不断涌入的外地人口，严重影响了本地居民的正当权益，而开放异地高考则会促使更多外地人口涌入北京。

On the Internet,Beijing nationals will support open different parents called the college entrance examination"Different surface".Explicitly affirms,Beijing including education resources, public resources was very abundance,It is for continuous influx of foreign population,Serious impact on the local residents' legitimate rights,Open different college entrance examination will lead to more foreign population into Beijing.

　　教育部副部长杜玉波在今年两会期间，曾明确表示“既要解决这些外来人口子女的考试就学问题，但也要考虑到城市的承载能力、当地学生的权益不受影响”。

Vice minister of education in this year DuYuBo sessions,Had made it clear that"Both to solve these foreign population children meet the exam,But also want to consider to the bearing capacity of the city/The rights and interests of local students shall not be affected".

地方利益“搅动”异地高考 Local interests"agitation"Different college entrance examination

专家称，只要向着大的公平方向发展，少部分人要做适当牺牲 Experts say,As long as toward big fair development direction,A few people to do proper sacrifice

　　多年来，与异地高考、取消高考户籍限制的呼声相伴，反对的声音也一直存在，大都来自高等教育优质资源丰厚、外来务工人员集中地区。专家认为，异地高考改革正是使教育向着大的公平方向发展，是大势所趋，势必要打破地方利益的垄断。

For many years,And different college entrance examination/Cancel the university entrance exam census register limit call associated,Against the voice has always been,Mostly from higher education quality resources rich/Migrant workers in concentration.Experts say,Different college entrance examination reform is make education toward a big fair development direction,Is the trend of The Times,Will be to break the monopoly place interests.

“门槛”设定>>地方政府是关键 "threshold"set>>The local government is the key

　　按照教育部日前的有关通知，各地应在年底前出台异地高考相关方案细则。“这其实是把制定政策的门槛，下放给地方政府了。”中国教育科学研究院研究员储朝晖说。

According to the ministry of education has the relevant notice,All should be before the end of the year the university entrance exam on different related scheme rules."It is to the threshold of the policy,Transferred to the local government."China's education scientific research institute researcher store from zhaohui said.

　　21世纪教育研究院副院长熊丙奇认为，制订异地高考方案牵涉到三个平衡，即本地户籍人口和非本地户籍人口的高考利益平衡；本地教育资源与进城务工人员子女接受教育需求的平衡；开放异地高考与防止高考移民的平衡等。“要解决好这些平衡，就需要意见交锋、利益博弈的平台；要制订合理的异地高考门槛条件，必须建立起让公众参与博弈的决策机制。”

The 21st century education institute, vice President of the XiongBingJi think,Make different college entrance examination scheme involves three balance,Is this locality census register population and the local population census register of the university entrance exam of balancing of interests;The local education resources and migrant workers children accept education demand balance;Open different college entrance examination and prevent the college entrance examination immigration balance, etc."To solve these balance,Will need to exchange opinions/Interest gaming platform;To establish the reasonable different college entrance examination threshold condition,Must set up for public participation in game decision-making mechanism."

　　“没有这样的民主决策过程，由地方政府教育行政部门拍板制订的异地高考方案，很可能既得不到户籍人口的支持，也难以满足进城务工人员的诉求，结果是两头不讨好。”熊丙奇说。

"There is no such democratic decision-making process,The local government education administrative department clappers for different college entrance examination scheme,Probably not only can not get the support of the household register population,Also difficult to meet the demands of rural migrant workers,The result is two head don't please."XiongBingJi said.

　　山东大学高等教育研究中心副主任刘志业认为，“涉及了谁的利益谁就跳出来反对，改革就无法进行了。改革是个调整利益的过程，只要向着大的公平方向发展，就势必有少部分人要做适当的牺牲。”

Shandong university higher education research center deputy director LiuZhiYe think,"Involved who interests who jumped out of the against,The reform could not.Reform is a process of adjustment of interests,As long as toward big fair development direction,It certainly will have a few people to do proper sacrifice."

　　熊丙奇认为，在方案出台过程中，异地高考问题被人为地复杂化了。“既要推进异地高考，又要维护现行高考制度，保证地方高考利益，异地高考当然十分复杂。”他说，如果从根本上改革按计划集中录取制度，问题也就迎刃而解。

XiongBingJi think,Come in in the process,Different college entrance examination problem is factitious ground is complicated."Not only to promote different college entrance examination,And to maintain the current college entrance examination system,Ensure that place the university entrance exam interests,Different college entrance examination of course is very complex."He said,If fundamentally reform plan concentrated enrollment system,Problems will be readily solved.

　　熊丙奇提出了解决问题的具体做法，一是实行全国统一考试、统一录取；二是全国统一考试、高校自主招生。

XiongBingJi puts forward the problem-solving practice,One is to implement the unified national examination/Unified admission;The second is the unified national examination/University autonomy enrollment.

　　相对而言，熊丙奇更赞成后一种做法，因为第一种做法进一步强调了分数在录取中的重要作用，会加剧基础教育的应试教育，再就是我国各地的教育资源并不均衡，不发达地区的教育落后，学生的竞争力会受到影响，难以和发达地区的学生竞争，虽然消除了“高考移民”，还是会出现“教育质量移民”。而第二种做法，首先符合我国高考改革的方向，可以打破一考定终身格局，并落实学校的办学自主权；其次，高校在录取中，可以结合考生统一考试成绩、中学学业成绩、大学面试考查和地区教育因素进行综合评价录取，尤其是可以通过地区教育因素，校正各地的教育质量差异，实现地区间的高考录取实质公平。(记者 杨凡 徐洁)

relatively,XiongBingJi after more in favor of a practice,Because the first practice further emphasized the important role of score in the admission,Will aggravate the foundation education takes an exam the education,And all over the country education resources is not balanced,Underdeveloped area education lag behind,Students' competitiveness will be affected,Difficult to and developed area students competition,Although eliminate the"College entrance examination immigrant",Will still appear"Education quality immigrants".The second kind of practice,First of all conforms to our country the university entrance exam reform direction,Can break a lifelong pattern discovery,And carry out the school autonomy;secondly,In colleges and universities in the admission,Can combine the examinee unified exam achievement/Middle school academic performance/University interview examination and regional education factors comprehensive evaluation admission,Especially can through the area education factors,Correction around the education quality difference,To realize regional college entrance examination admission essence fair.(Reporter YangFan XuJie)