吾乡民谚云：乌鸦笑猪黑，自己不觉得。我认为，将这个口诀赠给10月18日前往北京市教委反对异地高考的20位京籍家长，应该有醒神补脑的效用。在互联网上，一些京籍人士将支持开放异地高考的外地家长称之为“异闹”。但结合京籍家长代言人所持的理据，即诸如“外地孩子素质极差，打架斗殴带坏了本地小孩。外地孩子不断涌入，占用了过多的本地教育资源，"要想享受作为北京人的权利，必须先要承担责任"”等论调。再考虑到自2010年起开始呼唤教育公平，吁求开放异地高考的群体，已经有高达10万签名……显然这20位京籍家长，更适合“异闹”这一歧视性味道扑鼻的称谓。

My township minyan cloud:The crow laughing pigs black,Myself don't feel.I think,Will this a pithy formula to October 18 according to the Beijing municipal education commission against different college entrance examination 20 a Beijing by parents,There should be a wake god brain utility.On the Internet,Some Beijing nationals will support open different college entrance examination's foreign parents call"Different surface".But with Beijing by parents spokesperson have reasons,Namely such as"Children from poor quality,Fighting with bad the local children.Foreign children keep coming,Take up too much local education resources,"If you want to enjoy the rights of as Peking man,Must want to assume responsibility""Arguments such as.Then considering since 2010 began to call education fair,French retailer carrefour open different college entrance examination's group,Have as high as 100000 signatures...Apparently this twenty by the parents,More suitable for"Different surface"The discriminatory taste tangy appellation.

　　众所周知，多年来以地域为界的条块分割而壁垒高筑的高考制度，本源于过去政府为平衡各地教育资源所制定的政策，根据当时的历史条件，具有其合理性和正当性。但时过境迁，这项政策目前非但不适应社会发展的需求，还正在加剧教育资源分配的畸形，严重影响了教育的公平性，与现行的宪法和教育法相抵触，改革势在必行。

As is known to all,For many years with the regional for boundary which breaches the inherent separation and high barriers to build college entrance examination system,This comes from the past to balance government around the education resources policy of formulation,According to the historical condition at that time,Has its rationality and legitimacy.But as time passes by,The policy at present not only don't adapt to the request of social development,Also is intensifying education resources allocation of the deformity,Seriously affected the fairness of education,With the current of the constitution and the education laws conflict,Reform is imperative.

　　即使撇开20位京籍家长和10万支持开放异地高考签名的悬殊比例，从另一个角度，也不难看出开放异地高考实乃大势所趋。持上述理据反对开放异地高考的京籍家长，其维护自身利益的诉求固然值得尊重，但他们所本的理据之无力，所表现的素质之不堪，体现着狭隘的地域观念和落后的公民意识，正是北京这样历来占有最优质教育资源和长期享有高考录取低分优待政策的中心城市教育失败的写照。

Even put aside all 20 Beijing by parents and 100000 support open different polarization of the university entrance exam signature proportion,From another Angle,Also it is not difficult to see different Open University entrance exam solid the trend of The Times.The above reasons against open different the university entrance exam of Beijing by parents,Its appeal to safeguard their own interests is worthy of respect,But they are the reason according to the weak,The quality of the performance of the unbearable,Embodies the narrow regional concept and backward citizen consciousness,It is such as Beijing has always been the most high quality of education resources and long-term enjoy preferential policy of the college entrance examination admission low center city education failed portraiture.

　　不过，谈及开放异地高考政策，仅仅停留在判断和论述支持和反对双方孰是孰非之上，已经没有多大意义。一方面，从大局观和发展着眼，关乎全社会的教育公平的问题，显然比一个城市的教育资源被稀释和摊薄更为重要；另一方面，汲汲于点评争论双方的对错正误，无助于扭转双方在网上已经沦为攻讦、谩骂的局面。倒是与开放异地高考争执本身保持距离，探究一下开放异地高考政策何以出台，并且借此观照涉事各方利益博弈的格局，或许更有历史意义和社会价值。

but,Talk about different policy Open University entrance exam,Just stay in judgment and discusses support and opposition parties on files,Has not much meaning.On the one hand,From the vision and development focus on the,For all social education fair question,Obviously than a city of education resources are dilution and diluted is more important;On the other hand,Get busy to comment on both sides of the argument accruing from the right and wrong,Not turn on the Internet has become the prosecution/Invective situation.Is different with the Open University entrance exam dispute itself keep at a distance,Explore open policy on how different the university entrance exam,And take this view things in the interests of the pattern of the game,Perhaps more historical significance and social value.

　　事实上，现有开放异地高考政策并非教育部门所制定的前瞻性的政策，而是社会进步、经济发展特别是教育业发展倒逼的产物。这从目前异地高考政策中高筑的限制性“门槛”上不难看出。从更为深入和广阔的层面着眼，开放异地高考是计划经济转型为市场经济过程中必须突破的关隘，是城市化进程中的必然。此一政策的顺利实施，无疑可以解放教育业的生产力，大幅度降低社会成本，促进教育公平和教育发展。

In fact,The existing open foreign policy is not education department of the college entrance examination as set out in the forward-looking policies,But social progress/Economic development especially the education development DaoBi product.This from the current college entrance examination policy different high built restrictive"threshold"On it is not difficult to see.From the more deep and broad level with,Open different the university entrance exam is planned economy to market economy transformation in the process of breakthrough must pass,In the process of urbanization is inevitable.The smooth implementation of the policy,No doubt can liberate the productivity of education,Reduce social cost,To promote the education fairness and education development.

　　我们也必须看到，目前争执或者僵持局面的形成，既是陈旧的户籍制度引发的弊端，也是教育行政垄断，以及随之而来的教育资源的分配不公所导致的教育资源地方性垄断的后果。谈及异地高考政策，决策部门官员称，“异地高考政策既要解决城市外来人口子女的考试就学问题，也要考虑到城市的承载能力，保障当地学生的权益不受影响”。品味其中的“外来”与“当地”的表述方式，无疑呈现了户籍制度和地方政策壁垒带来的障碍。从中既不难看出异地高考政策制定的难点和困境所在，也不难察觉其中所谓的“当地学生的权益”的正当性可能遭到的质疑：如何将历史原因形成的特权与公正公平的教育权益予以区别、界定，然后恰当地予以切割和剥离？

We must also see,At present the formation of the dispute or a standoff,The old household registration system is not only caused by defects,Administrative monopoly is education,And the ensuing education resources allocation injustice caused by the education resources local monopoly consequences.Talk about different college entrance examination policy,Decision department officials say,"Foreign policy is to solve the university entrance exam of urban floating population children meet the exam,Also want to consider to the bearing capacity of the city,Safeguard the rights and interests of local students shall not be affected".Taste the"foreign"and"The local"Expression way,No doubt the present household registration system and local policy barriers to bring obstacle.It is not difficult to see different college entrance examination policy formulation and the difficulty in trouble,Also it is not difficult to perceive the so-called"The rights and interests of local students"The legitimacy of the likely to be questioned:How will the historical cause of formation of privileges and justice fair education rights shall be the difference/define,Then properly be cutting and stripping?

　　促进教育资源的合理分配以推动教育公平，开放异地高考政策仅仅是教育体制改革不得不迈出的一小步。如果将教育资源的行政垄断和地区不均衡比喻为优势地区筑坝蓄水的话，那么开放异地高考政策就是一个开闸放水以平均水位、一方决堤的过程。在这一过程中，必然会影响现有的利益格局，冲击和荡涤长期蓄水而形成的特权意识。历史经验证明，任何改革总是不免以局部的付出和减少部分人的利益为代价的。故而不妨断言，全社会的教育公平的进步，显然比维护几个长期享有优厚教育资源的中心城市的特权更重要。

To promote the education resources in order to promote the reasonable distribution of the education fair,Open different college entrance examination policy is only education system reform have to take a small step.If the education resources administrative monopoly and regional compare advantage area dam impoundment words,So open different college entrance examination policy is a sluice with average level/The process of one party burst its Banks.In this process,Will inevitably influence on the existing pattern of interests,Impact and cleansed long-term storage and the formation of the privileges of consciousness.Historical experience have proved that,Any reform is always unavoidable to local pay and reduce part of people's interests as the price.So might as well assert,All social education fair progress,Obviously than maintenance several long-term enjoy good education resource centre city privilege is more important.

　　当然，以20位反对异地高考政策的京籍家长，在一千多万京籍人口所占比例来看，几乎可以忽略不计。

Of course,With twenty foreign policy against the university entrance exam of Beijing by parents,In the more than one thousand Beijing population by the proportion to see,Almost negligible.

　　但无论他们所持的理据多么的无力和难以服众，他们为维护自己的利益表达不同意见的权利应该得到尊重和鼓励。从这个层面看，开放异地高考政策所引起的争议，正是一项公共政策利益相关各方通过公开博弈得以完善和取得合法性应有的状态，并获得远比争论本身更为重要的意义和价值。

But whether they have reason according to how weak and difficult to suit the,They to safeguard their own interests to express different opinion rights should be respected and encouragement.From this level to see,Open different college entrance examination policy of the controversy,It is a public policy stakeholders through the open game to perfect and the legitimacy of the state should be,And gain than debate itself more important significance and value.