《借读生情绪障碍家长诉教师》追踪

[JieDouSheng emotional disorders cause parents teachers]tracking

　　赵女士称儿子元元（化名）在借读期间遭老师侮辱人格，导致患上情绪障碍，为此将北京市育才学校通州分校和当事老师起诉到法院，要求索赔、道歉（本报去年9月4日见报）。通州法院一审驳回起诉，昨天，赵女士提交上诉状，她表示，手头有一份长达45分钟的录音材料，足以证明老师辱骂孩子，应该改判。

Zhao said ms son dollars(alias)During the unwelcome by teacher insult personality,Lead to suffer from emotional disorder,To Beijing tongzhou at yu CAI middle school, the teacher and the parties to Sue to the court,claim/apology(This newspaper last September 4 cases).Tongzhou court of first instance of a,yesterday,Ms zhao submit the petition of appeal,She said,Have a for 45 minutes of recording materials,To prove that the teacher abused children,Should translate.

　　本报记者李秋萌

Our reporter LiQiuMeng

家长诉说 Parents complained

老师竟然骂学生缺德 The teacher should scold students mean

　　据赵女士介绍，2010年11月的一天，上小学三年级的元元回家说自己被同学打，语文老师兼班主任张玉（化名）不但没有帮他，反而把他拽到办公室罚站两节课。为了解情况，赵女士在元元身上装了一个MP3，录音内容让她大吃一惊。

According to ms zhao is introduced,November 2010 a day,Elementary school grade three of the dollars home said they were classmates play,The language teacher and class teacher ZhangYu(alias)Not only did not help him,Instead, dragged him to the office standing two classes.To understand the situation,Ms zhao in dollars, with an MP3,Recording content let her surprise.

　　“我就说你坏话怎么了，你有好话让人说吗！你告诉我你有哪方面的优点让我说！说你坏话怎么了！……”赵女士说，MP3记录下张玉和其他老师在办公室对元元说的话，而这样的训斥整整持续了45分钟，其中还有元元的咳嗽声和哭泣声。

"I will say you of what,You have good things to say!You told me you have what advantage let me say!Say you of what!……"Ms zhao said,MP3 record ZhangYuHe other teachers in the office to yuanyuan said,And such reprimand lasted a full 45 minutes,With a dollar of cough and cries.

　　赵女士说，张玉还经常用一些侮辱人格的话辱骂学生，比如最坏、品质低劣、动物、缺德、疯子等等。

Ms zhao said,ZhangYuHai often use some humiliating words insult students,Such as the worst/Inferior quality/animals/mean/Madman, etc.

对心灵造成严重创伤 To the soul serious trauma

　　赵女士说，从6岁到8岁，元元一直在张玉的班里学习。元元学习成绩本来非常优秀，多次在班里考第一名，但张玉多次对元元进行无休止的惩罚、谩骂、羞辱和情绪虐待，让孩子变得异常紧张、恐惧和暴躁，甚至想自杀。医生确诊结果为“儿童情绪障碍”。

Ms zhao said,From the age of six to eight years old,Yuanyuan has been ZhangYu class learning.Yuanyuan study result was very good,Many times in the exam first,But many times ZhangYu to dollars for the endless punishment/abuse/Shame and emotional abuse,Let the children become nervous/Fear and irritable,Even want to commit suicide.The doctor diagnosed results"Children's emotional disorders".

　　“现在我们每周带孩子去找北大教授做心理治疗。教授说，因为体罚较多，负面评价过多，给孩子心理造成比较严重的创伤。我们曾试图劝说孩子原谅张玉，但是他没办法走出来，这几年的折磨对他幼小的心灵造成的伤害有多深，没人明白！”赵女士说。

"Now our children a week go to Peking University professor do psychological treatment.Professor says,Because the corporal punishment more,Negative evaluation too much,Give the child psychological cause serious trauma.We have been trying to persuade the child ZhangYu forgive,But he could not go out,The years of torture to his young heart damage caused by how much,No one understand!"Ms zhao said.

一审判决 verdict

虽言语不当但不担责 Although not words but not bear the responsibility

　　去年8月，赵女士代替元元，将北京市育才学校通州分校和张玉一并诉至法院。赵女士一共提出7项诉讼请求：要求口头、书面赔礼道歉；赔偿治疗费、精神损失费等合计17万余元。同年9月20日，通州法院正式立案。

Last August,Ms zhao instead of dollars,Beijing tongzhou will at yu CAI middle school campus and ZhangYu the court together.Ms zhao put forward a total of seven litigation request:Request oral/Written offer an apology;Compensation treatment/Mental suffering, and total more than 170000 yuan.September twenty,,Tongzhou court formally put on record.

　　去年11月27日，通州法院进行不公开审理。庭上，张玉称，可能对原告批评教育比一般的孩子多，但这正是因材施教、公平、公正对待学生的体现，也更说明了对原告的关怀，并不像原告所说的那样实施不公正待遇和非法待遇。

Last November 27,,Tongzhou court for trial in camera.The court,ZhangYu says,May be the plaintiff criticism education than the average more than children,But this is what teach students in accordance with their aptitude/fair/Just to the embodiment of the students,The more that the plaintiff's care,Don't like the plaintiff said that implementation of unfair treatment and illegal treatment.

　　庭审中，原告申请对校方、张玉在管理教育过程中的行为，与元元目前所患情绪障碍间是否存在因果关系进行鉴定。后经北京市高级人民法院摇号，未能确定相应鉴定机构。

hearing,The plaintiff for an application to the university/ZhangYu in management education in the process of behavior,And the dollars with emotional disorders whether there is causality between were identified.The Beijing municipal higher people's court wave number,Not sure of the corresponding appraisal institutions.

　　去年12月24日，通州法院一审判决，张玉在教育教学工作中虽存在语气不当、情绪急躁的情形，但并无违反师德的言行，无体罚或变相体罚的行为。元元目前所患情绪障碍与校方和张玉教育教学活动间并无因果关系。

On December 24,,Tongzhou court verdict,ZhangYu in the education teaching there is improper tone/Emotional impatient situation,But not in violation of the negative words and deeds,No corporal punishment or corporal punishment in disguised forms of behavior.The dollars with mood disorders and the school and ZhangYu education teaching activities and no causal relationship between.

提出上诉 appeal

老师骂人有录音为证 The teacher call names have recording for card

　　因对一审判决不服，昨天，赵女士向通州法院提交上诉状，要求撤销原判，依法改判。

Due to not verdict,yesterday,Ms zhao to tongzhou court in the petition of appeal,Requirement cancel ruling,Sentences in accordance with the.

　　赵女士的代理人、北京市陈志华律师事务所律师刘巍表示，多项法规均规定教师应当尊重学生的人格，不得歧视学生，不得对学生实施体罚、变相体罚或者其他侮辱人格尊严的行为。上诉人在原审中提交的录音证据，已经证明教师张玉对学生元元存在经常性的体罚、变相体罚行为及严重的辱骂、讽刺、威吓等侮辱人格的行为，并非仅仅为“语气不当，情绪急躁”。法院“未能确定鉴定机构”后，未进一步采取补救措施，继续委托可以进行此项鉴定的机构进行鉴定，却以“摇号未能确定鉴定机构”为由，认定上诉人承担举证不能的责任，实质上剥夺了上诉人的举证权利。

Zhao lady's agent/ChenZhiHua Beijing lawyer said opportunities,A number of laws and regulations are provisions teachers should respect students' personality,Shall not discriminate against the student,Not to implement the corporal punishment student/Corporal punishment in disguised forms or other insult personality dignity behavior.In the appellant submit evidence of the recording,Has been proved ZhangYu teacher to the student yuanyuan exist regular corporal punishment/Corporal punishment in disguised forms behavior and serious abuse/irony/Threat and insult personality behavior,Is not only for"Mood not,Emotional impatient".The court"Not sure of the appraisal institutions"after,Not to take remedial measures,Continue to entrust can be the appraisal institutions are identified,But with"Wave number not sure of the appraisal institutions"for,That the appellant to adduce evidence not responsibility,The burden of proof in the appellant deprived of rights.

　　(来源:京华时报)

(Sources: Beijing times)