临近年关，高校期末考试正在如火如荼地进行。最近，有不少新闻报道，国内高校大多以张榜公示的形式处理考试作弊。比如，武汉理工大学在教学楼、图书馆大厅的电子显示屏上公示在英语四六级考试、期末考试、重修课程考试等考试中舞弊学生的姓名、专业、班级及舞弊方式等信息；西安一高校在教学楼门口的大屏幕上公示违纪作弊学生的姓名、性别、籍贯、学号，违纪方法及处理办法，并在教学楼张贴“白纸黑字”的公告；黑龙江某高校大四学生考试舞弊的公告，还从校内网“翻墙”到了公共互联网，流传在外的污点信息让学生备受煎熬。

Close to year end,Colleges and universities are hot on the final examination.recently,There are many news reports,Domestic colleges and universities are mostly in the form of implementing public deal with cheating in the exam.Such as the,Wuhan university of science and technology in the teaching building/Electronic display of the library hall published in the English test band 4 and band 6/The final exam/Repairing course the names of the students cheating in examination, etc/professional/Information such as class and fraud;Xi 'an a big screen at the entrance to the building of colleges and universities listed on cheating the names of the students/gender/Native place/Student id,Discipline method and treatment method,And posted in the building"Black and white"The announcement of;Heilongjiang's announcement to a college senior student cheated in the exam,Also from the campus network"Over the wall"To the public Internet,The stain of circulating outside information to students.

　　高校张榜公示处理舞弊的考生，这在国内高校中很常见。如今高校的考试诚信氛围每况愈下，在遏制作弊的问题上，高校也是不得已而为之。但对于此类做法，向来还存在很多争议，争议的焦点大多集中于对学生个人隐私的侵犯。

List of colleges and universities public deal with fraud,This is very common in colleges and universities in China.Now university testing credit atmosphere go from bad to worse,On the issue of curb cheating,Colleges and universities is necessary.But for such practices,There are a lot of controversy,The focus of controversy mostly focus on violations of the privacy of students.

　　2012年8月末，世界最著名的大学哈佛大学也曝出了一桩学术诚信丑闻，在该校的一门春季课程中，近一半上课的学生涉嫌在期末考试中作弊，这也算是哈佛有史以来最大的作弊案。对此，哈佛大学官方发布公告确认该项学术作弊事故，但校方拒绝透露相关课程名称与学生情况，称“联邦隐私权法禁止学校公布相关学生姓名”。

End of August 2012,The world's most famous university of Harvard University also revealed a academic integrity scandal,In a course in the spring of the school,Nearly half of the class the students suspected of cheating in the final exam,This is also a harvard biggest cheating case.For this,Harvard University official announcement that the academic cheating in the accident,But the name of the school officials declined to comment on related courses and students,According to"Federal privacy laws prohibit schools reported related to the student's name".

　　对于该不该公示舞弊学生姓名，美国大学有法可依。反观国内，似乎还没有相关的法律规定来支撑目前高校的做法。

To the should not publish student names for fraud,American universities are laws.In contrast, the domestic,Does not appear to have relevant laws and regulations to support the practice in colleges and universities.

　　2012年1月，《国家教育考试违规处理办法》重新修订发布，对面向社会公开、统一举行的国家考试做出了统一的规定，该处理办法并未涉及高校学期内部考试，在违规行为认定和处理程序这一章中，也并没有具体说明要不要“公示”，期末考试对高校来说似乎更是一件“家务事”，大多由高校自己酌情处理。

In January 2012,[National education examination treatment method]Revising the release,For the public/Unified exam made unified regulations of the state,The treatment method of internal examination does not relate to the term,In irregularities identified and handling procedures in this chapter,Did not specify you want"Of the public",Seems it is a final exam for colleges and universities"Household chores",Most of his act accordingly by colleges and universities.

　　其次，我国现有法律对“隐私权”的解释大多散见于宪法、刑法、民法、诉讼法以及行政法律的有关规定中，对于隐私权的保护阐释得比较零散，不够系统，而关于隐私权的内容、外延等也并没有确定下来。虽然“公示”似乎是高校处理作弊现象普遍默认的做法，但也有高校选择不公示。而且，在具体公示的内容选择上也存在差别，有的只公示学生的部分信息，有的则公示全部信息，这也很难界定此类做法是否侵犯了学生的隐私权。

The second,Existing law of our country"The right to privacy"The interpretation of the mostly referring to the constitution/The criminal law/The civil law/In the procedure law and the relevant provisions of the administrative law,To protect the right of privacy more fragmented,Insufficient system,And about the content of the right of privacy/Denotation, etc are not identified.though"Of the public"Seems to be the default commonly deal with cheating of university,But also have the option not listed.and,There is a difference on the specific content of the choice also,Some only of the public part of information of students,Others are all public information,It is hard to define whether such practices violated the privacy of students.

　　笔者以为，作弊现象难以避免，但在处理办法上还可以进一步改进。一方面，高校在加大处罚力度的同时，有必要将舞弊处理的办法上升到法律层面，求得法律的支撑，处理的方式要更细则化；另一方面，也应加强诚信教育，这不仅要体现在新生的入学教育中，也要贯彻到大学学习的全过程。

The author thought that,Cheating is difficult to avoid,But in treatment method can be further improved.On the one hand,Colleges and universities at the same time of increasing penalties,There is a need to will be treated as fraud to rise to legal level,Get the support of the law,The means of processing to be more details;On the other hand,Also should strengthen the integrity education,This is not only to embody in freshmen entrance education,Also want to implement the whole process to study at a university.