【甲方】网上法庭带不来法治与公道 [Party a]Online court not rule of law and justice

　　陶短房

Tao short room

　　1994年发生的朱令铊中毒案件历经波折，至今未破，受害人及其家属长期生活在痛苦中，境遇令人同情。近日，这桩沉寂已久、早于1998年8月26日便已结办的谜案再度成为网络热点，一些人(包括相当多知名人士)将疑点指向当年和朱令同宿舍、如今已远嫁美国的孙维，以及朱令、孙维的其他同学，不少情节生动、联想丰富的“破案推理”在网络空间广泛流传，反响强烈，而某些网络交际平台的刻意“冷处理”反倒激发起“网络福尔摩斯”们更大的兴致，以及围观者更强烈的反响，一些人断言“案件不简单”、“嫌犯背后有人”，开始深挖“谜案不了了之”的“深层原因”，更有人把网络签名联署漂洋过海，一直搞到美国白宫网站，大有“中国不给公道就问美国要”的气魄，还有人将“国际媒体关注”之类当作“案件进展”的“天大喜讯”，把“国内关键词解禁”作为“风向要变”的报春之鸟，激动之情溢于言表。

Zhu made thallium poisoning case in 1994 after twists and turns,Has not yet broken,The victims and their families living in pain for a long time,Circumstances sympathetic.In recent days,This pile of silence already a long time/Earlier than August 26, 1998 has JieBan mystery once again become a hotspot,Some people(Including quite a few famous people)Pointed to suspect that year with zhu to the dormitory/Now Sun Wei has forced the United States,And zhu made/Sun Wei other students,A lot of plot and vivid/Lenovo's rich"Solve the case reasoning"Widespread in cyberspace,Strong reactions,And some deliberate network communication platform"Cold treatment"But inspire"Network of Sherlock Holmes"Have more fun,And the more strong response from onlookers,Some people assert that"Case is not simple"/"The suspect behind someone",Began to dig"Mystery go away"the"Underlying cause",More people to petition across the network,Always do to the White House web site,great"China is not fair to ask us to"The boldness of vision,There are those who will be"The international media attention"Such as a"The case progress"the"A big good news",the"Domestic keywords"As a"The wind is changing"The forerunners of,Excitement shows.

　　然而这种“网上法庭”真的能带来法制和公道吗？

However, this"Online court"Really can bring the rule of law and justice?

合理想象缺乏法律常识 Reasonable to imagine the lack of legal common sense

　　尽管绘声绘色的“真相”版本繁多，细节不少，但刨去种种“合理想象”，剩下的却只是“孙维有动机”、“孙维有作案条件”、“孙维有途径获得铊”等“嫌疑可能”，和“孙维有世家背景”等“脱罪可能”，但稍懂法律常识者都明白，有动机、有条件、有获取作案材料的途径，不代表就一定会作案，一如牙齿可以伤人，菜刀可以杀人，但并非每个拥有牙齿和菜刀的在场者都必定是杀人凶手一个道理；至于“世家背景”，且不说受害者本人同样出身不凡，且北京、清华这样的特殊场合和“命案必破”的中国特色下这样的背景究竟能起多少保护作用，单以出身而断定某人必然是罪嫌且犯罪后以此解脱，这样的逻辑链条，又符合多少真正的法治精神？

Although the graphic"The truth"Version of,A lot of details,But the plane to a variety of"Reasonable to imagine",The rest of the just"Sun Weiyou motivation"/"Sun Weiyou commit crime conditions"/"Sun Weiyou avenues for thallium", etc."Likely suspects",and"Sun Weiyou family background", etc."To take off the sin may",But slightly understand legal common sense who all understand,Have an incentive/conditional/Have access to commit crime of materials,Not represent will commit crime,As teeth can be hurtful,A kitchen knife can kill people,But not every have teeth and chopper all present a reason must be the murderer;As for the"Family background",Not to mention the victim himself from the same,And Beijing/Tsinghua university, and such special occasions"The murder will be broken"Under the Chinese characteristics of this background can play how much protection,List with origin and decided someone must be crime and crime to liberation,Such logic chain,And in many real spirit of the rule of law?

　　正如许多知情者所指出的，在长达4年的案件侦办过程中，孙维曾被作为重点嫌疑人进行调查，但最终因在法定期限内未掌握足以将其定罪的确凿证据而无法继续推动司法程序。

As pointed out by many people,In the process of case of up to four years of probing,Sun Weiceng was used as a key suspect in the investigation,But in the end, from within the statutory time limit does not grasp enough to its conviction evidence to continue to promote the judicial process.

　　在这个问题上，校方在案发之初的应对失措，则令公安、司法机关的疏漏被放大，以致造成案件侦办陷入“无法形成有效证据链”的死局。任何真心关注朱令案件，真心同情受害人境遇，真心希望借此案的“死变活”，推动中国社会法治化的人，都只能从“补充证据链”的角度去还原案件和现场，包括提供有力的人证、物证，嫌疑人的在场或不在场证据，唯如此，才能令当年无法进行下去的排查得以重启，大家冷静下来扪心自问， “有动机”、“是世家”、“有获得铊的途径”之类“新证据”，有哪一样可算得上证据—就不用说什么“铁证”了？一无新人证，二无新物证，仅以“她有动机”、“她家是权贵”之类“线索”，就在网上作有罪推定，搞“共议真相”，这难道就是“法治的精神”？

On this issue,At the beginning of the school at the response to your head,Has made the public security/The omission of judicial organs,As a result causes cases probing into"Can't form effective evidence chain"The stand-off.Any case focus on zhu,Genuine sympathy for the victims,Sincerely hope that through the case"Dead alive",Promote Chinese society under the rule of law of the people,Only from the"Supplementary evidence chain"To restore and field case,Including providing powerful witness/Physical evidence,Suspect the absence or presence of evidence,So only,To make the unable to continue trying to restart,We cool off, we ask ourselves, "Have an incentive"/"Is a family"/"Have a way to get the thallium"Such as"The new evidence",But what constitutes evidence - not to mention what"Proof #"the?Nothing new witness,No new evidence,Only in order to"She has a motive"/"Her family is powerful"Such as"clues",Just as a presumption of guilt on the Internet,make"GongYi truth",Is this"Spirit of the rule of law"?

　　毋庸讳言，中国的法制环境并不理想，具体到朱令悬案，更有许多疑点，且案件也的确至今未破，但这并不意味着，人们就可以用与法治精神背道而驰的“风闻断案”、“有罪推定”和“共议真相”手法，在一无新人证、二无新物证、三无新口供的情况下，便贸然将目标锁定在某个特定人物头上，用所谓“民众审判”(更确切说是“网络民众审判”)攘夺公检法的权限—这似曾相识的一幕，难道就是你我所追求的法治世界？

Needless to say,China's legal environment is not ideal,Specific to zhu unsolved,More many doubts,And the case has unsolved so far,But this does not mean that,People can use run counter to the spirit of rule of law"Got wind of resolution"/"Presumption of guilty"and"GongYi truth"methods,A new witness in nothing/No new evidence/3 without the new cases of oral confession,Then rushed to target at a particular character's head,Using the so-called"Public trial"(More exactly, a"Network public trial")Seize the courts authority - the familiar scene,Is what I'm after you rule the world?

　洋上访更不靠谱 The petition is unreliable

　　更令人啼笑皆非的是，一些热心人将请愿联署弄到白宫官网，以民粹方式要求美国政府将孙维驱逐出境，甚至试图通过境外媒体影响美国行政当局的决定。很显然，这些人中相当一部分，对依法解决悬案缺乏信心，转而采取这种“死马当活马医”的方法，其心情不难理解。

What is more ironic,Some enthusiasts petition signed up to the White House website,By populist government will Sun Wei deported from the United States,Even tried to through the foreign media influence us administration decision.obviously,These people quite a part of it,For solving the outstanding case in accordance with the lack of confidence,To take this"Dead horse move. The"The method,The mood is easy to understand.

　　然而这些联署者之所以跑到白宫网站上联署，归根结底，是相信美国系法治社会，既然如此，他们怎么可以相信，法制社会的美国会认同“疑罪从有”，在未得出法律结论的前提下就对一个移民采取非常措施？他们怎么可以相信，遵循三权分立原则的美国白宫，会攘夺司法机构的权限，对一名被非正式指控者的法律命运施加官方影响？他们又怎么可以相信，秉持“报道不干涉司法调查和庭审过程”原则的美国主流报章，会不顾原则地根据“网上法庭”的“共议真相”，去剥夺他人的人身权利—而且这个“网上法庭”还开在外国。

Yet these signed a cosigner's run to the White House website,At the end of the day,Is the belief that the United States department of the rule of law society,In that case,How can they believe,Social identity of the us legal system"Suspected crime from there",On the premise of no legal conclusions on an immigrant to take desperate measures?How can they believe,Follow the principle of separation of powers to the White House,Will seize the judiciary authority,For an accused by informal legal official influences of fate?How could they believe,Uphold the"Reported not to interfere in criminal investigation and trial"Principle of mainstream American newspapers,Regardless of the principle according to"Online court"the"GongYi truth",Deprived of the rights of others - and to this"Online court"Also open in a foreign country.

　　顺便说，所谓“白宫官网”，实则是靠网络舆情助选上台的奥巴马入主白宫后，2011年搭建的“我们人民”网页，是奥巴马“亲民临民”、关注舆情民情的一个姿态，该网页规定，允许任何13岁以上美国公民以后台实名、前台匿名的方式提交一份请愿书，只要请愿书联署总人数超过2.5万，白宫就承诺在30天内作出正式回应。

By the way,The so-called"The White House's official website",But in fact is to rely on network public opinion campaign came to power after Obama in the White House,Set up in 2011"We the people"Web page,Is barack Obama"People in the people"/Pay close attention to public opinion of the people of a gesture,The page rules,Allow any real-name after 13 years old or more U.S. citizens/Front desk anonymous way to submit a petition,As long as the petition signed a total of more than 25000,The White House has promised to make a formal response within 30 days.

　　自搭建以来，著名的“联署提案”既包括公布啤酒配方、呼吁大麻合法化等看上去比较“正经的”，也包括“给单身留学生介绍男女朋友”之类怎么看都不靠谱的，最“火”的一个提案，则是去年美国总统大选期间联署人数逾60万的“各州从美国联邦独立”。且不说这样一个“官网”能不能当作正经议事平台，也不说即便能当，这样一个议事平台能不能管中国的事，如前所述，请愿书联署获得“30天内正式回应”的必要条件，是至少2.5万联署者必须为13岁以上美国公民，说白了，这就是个美国总统和美国选民“套近乎”的虚拟空间，越洋联署的10万大军中，是否真有1/4的美利坚合众国公民？

Since the set up,The famous"Signed a bill"Both posted recipes/Calls for the legalization of marijuana look and compared"serious",Also include"Introduce to single students of men and women friends"Such as what are unreliable,One of the most"The fire"A proposal,Is last signed a number of more than 600000 during the us presidential election"Independence from the federal state to state".Apart from this one"website"Can you as a serious political platform,Also don't say even can be,Can such a platform on the tube in China,As mentioned above,Signed a petition"Formal response within 30 days"A necessary condition for,Is 25000 cosigner must be at least 13 years old or more U.S. citizens,To put it bluntly,This is a President of the United States and the United States voters"befriend"The virtual space,In the 100000 troops overseas affiliates,Is a quarter of the citizen of the United States of America?

群情激愤时，正义只在远方 When public anger,Justice only in the distance

　　应该说，朱令悬案再度变成热点后，中国国内某些网络平台对讨论层层设限的做法，让问题变得复杂化，也让许多同情朱令遭遇、对中国法治现状有看法者情绪更加激动，这些做法是不可取的。但尽管如此，“网上法庭”绝不能替代法庭、“民粹法治”绝不能替代法治，共议真相也未必是真正的真相，人们可以批判法制不健全、更不应对公权力践踏法治尊严留任何情面—但这些批判，只能建立在法治原则的基础上，否则便是以暴易暴，以亵渎法律精神对抗法律精神的亵渎。

It should be said,After zhu make the pending case once again become a hot spot,China's domestic some network platform for discussion upon the practice of the cap,To complicate issues,Also let many sympathetic to zhu/Have opinions about the present situation of China's rule of law is a more emotional,These practices are not desirable.But even so,"Online court"Can't replace the court/"Populism of the rule of law"Can't replace the rule of law,GongYi the truth also is not necessarily the real truth,People can criticize the rule of law is not sound/More should not be any have respect and dignity of the public power abuses, but the criticism,Can only be built on the basis of the principle of the rule of law,Otherwise it is a tactic,Blasphemy against the spirit of the law in the spirit of blasphemy laws.

　　值得一提的是，朱令悬案再度被炒热，导火索是上月发生的复旦大学黄洋中毒案，和时过境迁、现场还原和证据链梳理都变得十分困难的朱令案相比，刚刚发生的黄洋案无疑更容易展开调查，也更容易还原真相、循法律为受害者讨回公道，并依法严惩真凶，然而当朱令案火爆到“漂洋过海”时，那千万双充满同情、饱含争议的眼睛，还有几双仍能持续盯住黄洋案？甚至，为近20年前遭罹不幸者奔走鼓呼者，还有几人能完整记住黄洋中毒案各主要当事人的名姓？ 作者系专栏作家

It is worth mentioning,Zhu has unsolved fired hot again,Fuse of fudan university Huang Yang poisoning happened last month,And over time/Spot reduction and evidence chain of comb is very difficult zhu compared to the case,Just happened in Huang Yang undoubtedly easier to investigate,Were also more likely to restore the truth/Follow the legal justice to victims,And in accordance with the law to punish those responsible,But when zhu in the case"Across the"when,It must double full of sympathy/Controversy in the eye,And several pairs can still continue to peg Huang Yang case?even,For nearly 20 years ago who shout. Base on the drum,There were a few people can remember Huang Yang poisoning complete name the major parties? The writer is a columnist