收到针对性极强的卖答案短信考生怀疑信息泄露相关部门表态信息不可能泄露，并提醒考生不要上当。这种事件近年成为“被做烂的新闻题材”之一。

Received pertinence strong sell the answer SMS examinee doubt information leakage related department to declare the information may not leak,And remind candidates don't fall for it.This event in recent years become"Be done bad news story"of.

　　近日，笔者以“考生信息泄露”等关键词进行网络检索，共有70多页结果，其中媒体报道百余篇。在这份不完全的样本中，各年份报道数量从起初的2006年1篇、2009年5篇，突然增长到2010年21篇、2011年34篇。今年，截至目前已有40余篇。

recently,Based on"Examinee information leakage"The keywords such as network retrieval,There are more than 70 pages of the results,The media report papers.In the incomplete samples,Each year the number of reports from the beginning in 2006 1 article/In 2009 five articles,Suddenly increased to 2010 in 21 article/Article 34 in 2011.This year,So far more than 40 papers.

　　在这些报道中，53篇与高考或事业单位招考。其中关于短信或电话的内容，“卖答案”有48篇，46篇涉及院校招生广告，16篇是培训机构推销，5篇是改分数或志愿。

In these reports,Article 53 with the university entrance exam or institution admit by examination.The message or phone content,"Sell the answer"There are 48 article,Article 46 in college admissions advertising,16 paper is training institutions to sell,Five articles is to score or volunteer.

　　这些报道还有一个共同点：在提及事件处理的进展和后续时，大多数不了了之。

These reports have one thing in common:In the mentioned event handling of progress and the follow-up,Most conclude without concrete result.

　　不是没有人想对考生个人信息泄露的源头问责，江苏汇商律师事务所律师吕剑峰就是其中之一。

Is not no one want to to the examinee personal information leakage source accountability,Jiangsu remittance business law firm lawyers LvJianFeng is one of them.

　　2010年6月，吕剑峰报考了清华大学(招生办)的公共管理硕士(MPA)。与众多考生一样，此后3个月里，他开始频繁收到“卖MPA答案”的短信。吕剑峰认为，短信针对性极强，很可能是报名时个人信息遭到泄露。作为律师，他决定通过民事诉讼的途径讨个说法。

In June 2010,LvJianFeng enter oneself for an examination of tsinghua university(Admission office)The master of public administration(MPa).As with many candidates,After three months,He began to frequent received"Sell MPa answer"Of message.LvJianFeng think,SMS pertinence is extremely strong,When signing up is likely to be personal information was leaked.As a lawyer,He decided to through civil litigation way to make a statement.

　　2011年8月，南京市鼓楼区人民法院开庭审理此案，教育部学位与研究生教育发展中心、河海大学(招生办)、南京航空航天大学、江苏省教育厅成为被告。此案一度被媒体称为“《侵权责任法》实施以来南京公民隐私维权第一案”。

In August 2011,Nanjing GuLouOu people's court the case,The ministry of education degree and postgraduate education development center/Hohai university(Admission office)/Nanjing university of aeronautics and astronautics/Jiangsu province department of education become the defendant.The case was once called by the media"[Tort liability law]Since the implementation of the first case of nanjing citizen privacy rights".

　　“那个案子我后来撤诉了，这个结果可能会令你失望。”在接受笔者采访时，吕剑峰无奈地表示，他目前不方便向公众透露撤案的具体原因。

"The case I later withdraw the,This result may make you disappointed."In an interview with the writer,LvJianFeng helplessly said,He is not convenient CheAn revealed to the public the specific reason.

　　据吕剑峰回忆，2010年6月，他先登录中国学位与研究生教育信息网报名，一个月后到河海大学现场确认、交费。接着，河海大学将考生信息交给南京航空航天大学处理，南京航空航天大学把处理后的信息报给江苏省教育厅，江苏省教育厅又将信息上报给教育部。

According to LvJianFeng memories,In June 2010,He first login China degree and postgraduate education information network registration,After a month to hohai university site confirmed/fee.then,Hohai university will examinee information to the nanjing university of aeronautics and astronautics processing,Nanjing university of aeronautics and astronautics after the treatment of news for jiangsu province department of education,Jiangsu provincial department of information and report to the ministry of education.

　　在诉状中，吕剑峰援引《侵权责任法》隐私权保护的内容，要求上述4家单位赔礼道歉、停止侵权、消除不良影响，并主张退还报名费240元、精神损害赔偿金240元。

In the petition,LvJianFeng quoted[Tort liability law]The content of the privacy protection,For the above four units offer an apology/To stop the infringing/Eliminate the bad effects,And claims return entry fee is 240 yuan/The mental damage compensation is 240 yuan.

　　对于该案，北京市人大常委会立法咨询专家委员、北京天达律师事务所合伙人钱列阳认为，原告很难举证证明信息是从负责个人信息收集的单位泄露出去的。“民事案件的举证责任分配是‘谁主张谁举证’，你把信息给了报考单位，可是你怎么证明你没给其他人？对方确实得到了你的信息，可你怎么证明这种得到是唯一的、排他的？”

For the case,The standing committee of Beijing municipal people's congress legislation consultation experts committee/Beijing day reaches the partners of this law firm listed Yang think money,The plaintiff difficult to produce evidence to prove the information from responsible for personal information collection units of the leak out."Civil cases of onus probandi allocation is‘Who advocate who burden’,The information you to enter oneself for an examination unit,But how do you prove that you didn't give others?Each other really got your information,But how do you prove this kind of get is the only/exclusive?"

　　吕剑峰当时的思路是，找3名也收到过“卖答案”短信的大学同学出庭作证。

LvJianFeng was thinking is,Find three also received"Sell the answer"SMS university students appeared in court to testify.

　　他认为，如果要让全世界的人挨个表态“没有泄露信息”才算完成举证义务的话，显然不可能，法院也不会要求这样做。“我的3位证人都是江苏省司法系统的工作人员，证言可信度相对较高，这就够了。”

He thinks,If you want to make people around the world round comment"Not to reveal the information"In order to complete proof obligations words,Apparently impossible,The court will not require it."My three witnesses are staff members of the judicial system in jiangsu province,Testimony credibility is relative taller,That's enough."

　　在这之前，吕剑峰尝试在考点外现场寻找支持者，也上网发帖征集，可大多数人只愿提供“精神支持”。甚至，他还按短信留的联系方式与自称卖答案的人联系，希望能取得一些证据。

Before that,LvJianFeng try in the examination site looking for the supporters,The Internet also post solicitation,But most people only willing to offer"Spirit support".even,He also according to the message leave contact information and claims to sell the answers contact,Hope to have some evidence.

　　开庭是2011年的事情，距报名MPA已时隔一年。对吕剑锋来说，庭审过程并不顺利。据《现代快报》报道，庭审当天，双方都无法拿出充分证据，直接证明被告方存在侵权行为，或者对原告没有侵权。当法官询问原被告是否同意调解时，双方都表示不同意。

The hearing is 2011 years of things,Distance registration MPa already after a year.For LvJianFeng to,Trial process is not smooth.According to[Modern express]reports,Trial day,Both sides can't take out sufficient evidence,Directly prove existence defense of infringement,Or to the plaintiff no infringement.When the judge asked whether committed when agreed to mediation,Both sides say don't agree.

　　法庭没有当庭宣判，后来也鲜有媒体跟进此事。吕剑峰告诉笔者，由于受某些因素影响，事后他只能无奈撤诉，“我不太愿意撤诉。这个案子我等了一年多，对结果也很期待，本来一定要打到底。”

The court did not at court sentenced,And few media follow up this matter.LvJianFeng told the author,By some factors,Afterwards he can only but withdraw,"I'm not too would like to withdraw.In this case, I waited for more than a year,The results is also looking forward to,Originally must fight."

　　在吕剑峰看来，他对涉及自己的个案结果其实“无所谓”，但如果放在法治进程的历史长河来看，我国目前还没有个人信息保护的典型诉讼案例。

In LvJianFeng seems,He relating to their own case results in fact"Doesn't matter",But if the rule of law in the process of history to see,Our country does not have the personal information protection of typical litigation case.

　　2011年12月，中国青年报社会调查中心对1958人进行的调查显示，有73.0%的受访者在遇到个人信息遭泄露后选择忍气吞声，15.6%的人会查询谁是泄露者，10.4%的人会去举报，6.0%的人表示无所谓。

In December of 2011,The China youth daily social research center survey of 1958 people display,73.0% of the respondents to meet a personal information disclosure by choice submit to humiliation,15.6% of the people who will be inquires is that leak,10.4% of the people will go to report,6.0% said they don't matter.

　　在个人信息保护领域，常被提及的我国新近立法是2009年2月公布的《刑法修正案(七)》的规定：国家机关或者金融、电信、交通、教育、医疗等单位的工作人员，违反国家规定，将本单位在履行职责或者提供服务过程中获得的公民个人信息，出售或者非法提供给他人，情节严重的，处三年以下有期徒刑或者拘役，并处或者单处罚金。

In the field of personal information protection,Often referred to our new legislation is released in February 2009[Amendments to the criminal law(seven)]regulations:State organs or financial/telecom/traffic/education/Medical treatment unit staff,In violation of state regulations,Will this unit in the prosecution of his duties or provide services acquired during the citizens' personal information,Illegal to sell or provide to others,If the circumstances are serious,A maximum of three years imprisonment or criminal detention,A fine concurrently or separately.

　　“这个罪在司法实践中用得比较少。” 钱列阳表示，考生收到骚扰短信，确实有一定社会危害性，但若想走向刑事司法，操作起来比较困难。因为涉及危害后果、数量、证据等问题。

"The crime in judicial practice with less." Money column Yang said,Candidates receive a text message harassment,Do have certain social harmfulness,But to to criminal justice,It is difficult to operate.Because involving harmful consequences/quantity/Problems such as evidence.

　　2003年，中国社科院法学研究所草拟了《个人信息保护法》的专家意见稿，共计8万字。但时至今日，该法出台仍无明确的时间表。

In 2003,,By the Chinese academy of social sciences institute of law drawn up[Personal Data Protection Act]The expert opinion draft,A total of 80000 words.But today,Introduced the method is still no clear timetable.

　　吕剑峰用“放水养鱼”来形容目前的考生个人信息管理。由于无法可依、维权成本较高，类似现象似乎越来越多。“等情况严重再立法，这是‘放水养鱼’，已有的损害无法弥补。那些人现在掌握了我电话，等立法出来，我的信息已经转了多少手了？”

LvJianFeng with"Drain fish"To describe the current candidates personal information management.Unable to can depend on/Rights high cost,Similar phenomenon seems to be more and more."Severe cases such as legislation again,This is‘Drain fish’,The existing damage cannot make up for.Those people are now mastered my phone,Legislation out such as,My information has turned many hand?"

　　钱列阳也有同样的担忧。他认为，如今互联网的应用越来越普及，但公民信息保护的立法却跟不上，“不就等于有了柏油马路，但没有快慢车分道线，没有红绿灯，没有斑马线，车不就是随便开吗？怎么开都是合法的。”

Money column Yang also have the same concern.He thinks,Now, the application of the Internet is becoming more and more popular,But civil information protection legislation but can't keep up,"Don't equal to the asphalt road,But not the speed of the car lane line,There are no traffic lights,No zebra crossing,The car is not literally open?How to open is legal."

　　“其实，谁都知道应该保护公民个人信息，但保护的界限、范围是什么？另外，立法要注重实际操作，如果没有合适的程序和可操作性，而只是空洞的口号‘反对倒卖个人信息’，是没有意义的。”钱列阳说。

"In fact,Who all know should protect citizens' personal information,But the boundaries of protection/What is the scope?In addition,Legislation should pay attention to the actual operation,If there is no proper procedures and operability,But an empty slogan‘Against the stripping personal information’,Is meaningless."Money column Yang said.

　　(中国青年报)

(The China youth daily)