《山东省见义勇为奖励和保护条例》将在12月1日正式实施。吸引媒体聚焦的，是“条例”中的一个新规：见义勇为受益人应当对见义勇为人员及其家庭成员表达谢意、予以慰藉。（11月7日《山东商报》）

[Heroic shandong province rewards and protection regulations]Will be in December 1, officially implemented.To attract media focused,is"regulations"In a new gauge:Never hesitated to beneficiary beneficiary should never hesitated to staff and their family members express gratitude/To comfort.(On November 7,[Shandong commercial daily])

　　对此话题，网民的踊跃跟帖宣示着弥漫在网络社会里的道德焦虑。远的不说，就在最近的几个月里，受益人对见义勇为者避之不及的个案屡见报端。“义士”流血又流泪的悲凉感，对大众心理带来了或强烈或微妙的冲击。在此背景下，山东省试图以一纸规程来更好地促进道德回归，应当肯定，这是一个有益的尝试。

For this topic,Users of the post enthusiastically publicize diffuse in the network society moral anxiety.Far not,Just in the last few months,Beneficiary beneficiary to those never hesitated to avoid the sufferer is often seen in cases of press."A righteous man"Blood and tears of BeiLiangGan,To public psychological brought or strong or subtle impact.In this context,Shandong trying to a paper rules to better promote moral regression,Shall be sure,This is a beneficial attempt.

　　当然，在网上一片叫好之声中，也有冷静的评论指出：受益人对见义勇为人员及其家庭成员表达谢意、予以慰藉，这是他们理应做的。山东这是在试图将道德问题法律化。

Of course,On the Internet a piece of the sound of gave in,Also have cool comments point:Beneficiary beneficiary to never hesitated to staff and their family members express gratitude/To comfort,This is they should do.Shandong this is trying to legalization of moral problems.

　　但从备受争议的这一条款来看，“受益人应言谢”并不是一个典型的法律规范。因为法律规范通常由“假定、处理、制裁”三要素构成，而“受益人应言谢”缺乏“制裁”这一要素也就是说，如果受益人没有“感恩”，“条例”也不能拿他怎么着。

But from the controversial this clause to see,"The beneficiary should thank"Is not a typical legal norm.Because the legal norm usually consists of"Assume that/processing/sanctions"Three elements,and"The beneficiary should thank"Lack of"sanctions"The element that is,If the beneficiary without"gratitude","regulations"Also can't take him what happened.

　　这条规定实则是一个倡导性规范。从中国的立法来看，倡导性规范并不少见，这或许可称得上是一个“中国问题”：一是中国正处于社会大转型，多元化的价值观和道德观正在激烈碰撞；二是中国长期受“全能政府”模式影响，政府对于促进和建设新的社会秩序负有更重要的责任，或者说政府在提升全民道德观念上被一些公众寄予了更多的期望。两相结合之下，倡导性规范层出不穷。

This rule in fact is a advocate sexual norms.From China's legislation to see,Advocate sexual norms is not rare,This may be called is a"China":One is Chinese are in the big social transformation,Diversified values and morality are fierce collision;The second is by China's long-term"Almighty government"Mode and effect,The government to promote and construction of a new social order has more important responsibility,Or the government improve the moral ideas by some public place more expectations.Two phase under combined,Advocate sexual norms emerge in endlessly.

　　我们固然不能轻易否定倡导性规范，也无法对倡导性规范抱持太大希望它毕竟不能依赖国家机器强制执行。“感恩”应发自内心，哪怕真能实现“强制言谢”，也未必能收获“真诚”的感恩。因此，我倒觉得类似“条例”最大的看点，还在于对见义勇为的奖励和保护。基于政府自身职能的奖励与保护，当然不能只“倡导倡导”就完了。

We is not easily deny advocate sexual norms,Nor to advocate sexual norms held too big hope it after all can't depend on state machine for compulsory execution."gratitude"Should be from the heart,Even if true can realize"Forced thank",Also not necessarily can harvest"sincere"grateful.therefore,I think similar"regulations"The biggest attraction,It is warm to reward and protection.Based on the function of government own reward and protection,Of course not only"Advocating advocate"Finished the.