新闻背景：在温州一事业单位公开招录中，一名得了9分的考生进入面试，3名得了50分的考生则未能进入面试，引起广泛关注。

News background:In wenzhou a business unit of public ZhaoLu,A had nine points of the examinee enter interview,Three scores 50 candidates is failed to enter interview,Aroused widespread concern.

　　让信息透明跑赢质疑

Let information transparent run win questioned

　　9分进入面试，是“因为文化馆招录1人而仅有3人报名，按照1∶3的面试比例考生全部进入面试”。而50分未能进入面试，则因为报考的是其他岗位。来自录用部门的解释，倒也有一定道理。现实中，的确会出现由于报考人数不同、不同岗位面试分数线差异较大的情况。

Nine points into the interview,is"Because cultural centre ZhaoLu one and only three people signed up,According to 1:3 interview proportion all examinee enter interview".And 50 points failed to enter interview,Because enter oneself for an examination the other posts.From the employment department explanation,But also have a certain sense.reality,Indeed will appear because of different number of applicants/Different post interview score of differences.

　　不过，公布时没有任何说明解释，任谁也会生出“萝卜招聘”的质疑和“暗箱操作”的猜想。铺天盖地的质疑声是一种提醒：如果公开面试名单之时能对“9分进面试”这个明显会引起疑问的信息做一些解释，是不是就能避免公众在“无知之幕”下作出负面想象？治未病而不治已病，这同样适用于政府信息公开事前的充分预案与信息公开，胜于事后的百般解释。（北京李拯）

but,When released without any notes to explain,Let who will produce"Radish recruitment"Question and"black-box"guess.The deluge of question sound is a reminder:If the public interview list to"Nine points into an interview"The obvious question causes the information to do some explanation,Are they able to avoid in the public"Curtain of ignorance"Imagine a negative?Treating disease before and has died of disease,The same applies to the government information openness ex-ante fully plan and information publicly,Is better than afterwards in every possible way to explain.(Beijing LiZheng)