案情

The case

　　初中生酒后被打致一级伤残

Junior high school students have been playing the level of disability

　　北京市首例因向未成年人售酒，商家被索赔案件近日将在房山区人民法院再次开庭审理。记者从房山法院了解到，被告之一即向初中生售酒的小饭店可能因此支付巨额赔偿款。此案或将改变人们对酒类“禁售令”禁而不止、禁而不罚的传统认识，从而起到重大的警醒教育作用。

Beijing's first serve drinks to minors,Merchants are case recently in fangshan district people's court trial again.The reporter understands from well court,The little restaurant one of the defendants is to sell wine in junior high school students may pay huge properly.The case or will change people to the wine"May make"JinErBuZhi/Ban instead of traditional knowledge,To play a major role in the alert education.

　　刘某与韩某是初中三年级的同学，2012年2月25日中午，两人受同学丁某邀请，到村里一个小饭店吃饭。席间刘某与韩某因喝酒问题言语不和，喝高了的刘某跟随在去厕所的韩某身后，用啤酒瓶将韩某头部打伤，造成韩某急性重型颅脑损伤（重伤），至今仍昏迷不醒。8月，刘某因故意伤害罪被判处有期徒刑8年。后韩某的家长将刘某及其父母、聚会组织者丁某、饭店业主等人诉至法院，要求赔偿经济损失。原告认为，饭店业主隗某违法向未成年人出售白酒及啤酒，违反了商务部“禁止向未成年人售酒”的规定，应对原告的损失承担补充赔偿责任。

LiuMou and HanMou is junior high school grade three of the students,On February 25, 2012 at noon,Two people were classmates more invitation,To a small restaurant in the village.Banquet LiuMou and HanMou words because of drinking problem,Drink up the LiuMou follow behind HanMou of go to the bathroom,HanMou head struck with beer bottles,HanMou caused by acute severe craniocerebral injury(Seriously injured),Still unconscious.On aug.,LiuMou for intentional injury was sentenced to imprisonment eight years.After HanMou parents will LiuMou and their parents/Party organizer more/Hotel owner who appeal court,Claim compensation for economic losses.The plaintiff think,Hotel owner Kui some illegal selling wine and beer to minors,Violation of the ministry of commerce"No sale to the minors"The provisions of the,Should add to the plaintiff's loss undertakes the liability for compensation.

　　案件审理过程中，原告对韩某伤情及是否需要后续治疗、康复治疗、辅助残疾器具、今后护理依赖程度、伤情所需营养期、护理期等提出鉴定申请。据了解，原告伤情已达到最严重的一级伤残，对于当事人来说，其总损失可以说是个天文数字。而饭店老板也可能面临高达数十万元的赔偿款。

Case in the process,Whether the plaintiff to HanMou injury and subsequent treatment is needed/rehabilitation/Assist disabled vessels/In the future nursing dependence/Nutrients necessary to injury/Nursing of applying for identification.It is understood,Plaintiff's injury has reached the level of the most severe disability,For the party,The total loss is a astronomical, so to speak.And restaurant owners also could face up to hundreds of thousands of yuan of properly.

　　困境

trouble

　　“禁售令”形同虚设管不住商家

"May make"Propecting the merchants

　　据了解，早在1999年我国颁布的《中华人民共和国预防未成年人犯罪法》中就有规定：“任何经营场所不得向未成年人出售烟酒”；2005年7月1日，商务部颁布规定，全国酒类经营者都不准向未成年人出售酒类商品；2006年修订的《中华人民共和国未成年人保护法》中规定“禁止向未成年人出售烟酒，经营者应当在显著位置设置不向未成年人出售烟酒的标志；对难以判明是否已成年的，应当要求其出示身份证件。”

It is understood,As early as 1999 promulgated by the China[The prevention of juvenile delinquency of the People's Republic of China]In regulation:"Any business premises shall not sell tobacco to minors";On July 1, 2005,The ministry of commerce issued regulations,The alcohol operator all goods are not allowed to sell alcohol to minors;Revised in 2006[Minor protection law of the People's Republic of China]Specified in the"Prohibited from selling cigarettes to minors,Operators should be in a significant position setting don't sell cigarettes to minors;To determine whether the adult,Shall require its identification."

　　尽管法律法规三令五申，但“禁售令”并没有管住商家，未成年人仍能随意买到酒类商品。对此，部分商家解释：一是来买烟酒的未成年人声称是家长让来买的，商家无力明辨真假；二是出于营利目的，认为“我不卖，他也会从其他地方买，上门的生意干吗推掉？”利益驱使，违法成本低，加上监管手段的缺失，都使得“禁售令”形同虚设，处境尴尬。

Even though reduce the laws and regulations,but"May make"Did not hold the businessman,Minors can still buy alcoholic goods at random.this,Partial businessman interpretation:One is to buy cigarettes, claims to be parents of minors make to buy,Merchants to distinguish true and false;2 it is for profit-making purposes,think"I don't sell,He will also buy from other places,Why put off the door of the business?"The interests of the driven,The illegal cost is low,Combined with the lack of regulation means,All that"May make"propecting,An awkward situation.

　　析案

XiAn

　　可能改变对“禁售令”模糊认识

Possible to change to"May make"Fuzzy understanding

　　部分地方在立法禁止向未成年人售酒方面走在了前面。山西省《未成年人保护条例（草案）》规定：任何经营场所不得向未成年人出售烟酒，经营场所应当在显著位置设置禁售标志和举报电话。任何人不得指使未成年人为其购买烟酒。违反该规定的，将由工商行政主管部门责令改正，并给予警告；情节严重的，处以200元以上2000元以下罚款。安徽省《未成年人保护条例》规定，烟酒店禁止向未成年人出售烟酒，并在显著位置设置不向未成年人出售烟酒的标志，拒不执行的将被处以50元以上200元以下罚款；情节严重的，处以200元以上1000元以下罚款。

Parts in legislative ban serve drinks to minors in walking in the front.Shanxi Province[Minors protection regulations(The draft)]Provisions of the:Any business premises shall not sell tobacco to minors,Business premises shall be set in a significant position lock symbol and report.No one may make a minor as its buying cigarettes.Violation of the provisions,By the competent administrative department for industry and commerce shall be ordered to make corrections,And be given a warning;If the circumstances are serious,Impose a fine of not more than RMB 200 yuan and RMB 2000 yuan.In anhui province[Minors protection regulations]Provisions of the,Premises prohibited from selling cigarettes to minors,And the significant position setting don't sell cigarettes to minors,Refused to carry out the will be fined up to 50 yuan of above 200 yuan;If the circumstances are serious,Impose a fine of not more than RMB 200 yuan and RMB 1000 yuan.

　　有专家认为，“禁售令”没有指出执法主体是谁，也没有具体的惩罚措施，存在实体、组织和程序的缺失，很难从一部“书面的法律”变成“行动的法律”。本案的审理有可能改变这一看法。

Some experts think that,"May make"No who is pointed out that the law enforcement main body,No specific punishment measures,An entity/The lack of organization and procedures,It is difficult to from a"The laws of the written"Become a"Action of the law".The trial of the case is likely to change the idea.