郑州航院三名学生因涉嫌舞弊被学校开除学籍，三人分别起诉后，学校的处分决定均遭法院否决

Zhengzhou navigation court three students for suspected fraud has been expelled from school student，Three people were charges，The school decided to veto by the court all disciplinary action

高校处理学生为何屡遭败诉尴尬 College students by repeatedly lose processing why embarrassing

　　学生因考试舞弊而被开除，这件在许多人看来天经地义的事，却常常得不到法律的支持。

Students who was fired for cheated in the exam，This it seems to many people that part of the natural order of things，But often can not get the support of the law。

　　2011年6月18日上午，全国大学英语四级考试。在郑州航空工业管理学院(以下称“郑州航院”)的考场里，工商管理专业学生李放(化名)的一块“橡皮”引起了监考老师的注意，他们检查后发现，这块“橡皮”竟是个橡皮状电子接收器，上面带有英文相关内容。

June 18, 2011 morning，College English test band 4。In zhengzhou aviation industry management institute(The following says“Zhengzhou navigation court”)In the test room，The industry and commerce management major LiFang students(aliases)A piece of“rubber”Caused the supervisor's attention，They found after examination，this“rubber”Should be a rubber shape electronic receiver，With above English related content。

　　当日，严抓校风学风的郑州航院在校园张贴通告，称李放构成严重考试作弊，考试成绩无效，根据学校相关规定，给予开除学籍处分。

On that day，Strict school spirit the style of study in campus of zhengzhou navigation posted notices，Say a serious LiFang cheating in the exam，Exam achievement is invalid，According to the school rules，Give expelled disciplinary action。

　　2012年1月，法院一审判决郑州航院开除学籍的处分“程序违法，依法应予撤销”，同时判令学院恢复李放的学籍。

January 2012，Court verdict zhengzhou air courtyard expelled punishment“Program illegal，Shall be revoked in accordance with the”，At the same time to judge the recovery of the LiFang college student。

　　让郑州航院头痛的是，类似的案例还不止一例，仅今年上半年在法院就判了3例。放眼全国，类似的案例也发生过数起，其中有不少也是学校败诉。

Let the headache of zhengzhou navigation is，Similar case is more than one example，Only the first half of this year in court sentenced to 3)。Look to the national，Similar case also happen up more，Many of the school is losing。

　　为何学校的处分决定屡屡遭遇败诉尴尬？司法机关应不应该对学校进行监督？如何监督？这是否意味着学校的自主办学权受到了干涉？由此引发的问题引人深思。

Why the school sanctions on losing embarrassed to encounter？The judicial authorities shall conduct supervision and should not be in the school？How to supervise？Does this mean that the school run independently right is the interference？Thus the problem caused by thought-provoking。

不服学校处分决定，学生纷纷选择起诉 School sanctions is not decided，Students have choose prosecution

　　郑州航院对李放的处理决定并非没有依据，该院《学生违纪处分规定》就明确表示：“被认定为严重违反考试纪律者，给予严重警告处分；被认定为考试作弊者，视情节给予记过以上处分；被认定为严重考试作弊者，给予开除学籍处分”。

Zhengzhou navigation to LiFang decision of the court is not without the basis，the《Students disciplinary regulations》It made it clear that：“Are recognized as a serious violation of JiLvZhe exam，Give serious warning punishment；Is recognized for the cheating in the exam，On the above sanctions to give a demerit；Is recognized for a serious the cheating in the exam，Give expelled disciplinary action”。

　　正是凭借上述规定，郑州航院于2011年6月20日向李放送达《郑州航空工业管理学院学生违规处理告知书》。一天后，《关于给予李放开除学籍处分的决定》的文件形成。

It is on the above provisions，Zhengzhou navigation court in June 20, 2011 to LiFang delivered《Zhengzhou aviation industry management college students' handling of violation notice》。A day after，《About giving lee in the decision to release student status sanctions》File form。

　　但李放不服，立即向郑州航院“学生申诉处理委员会”提出申诉。

But LiFang refuses to，Zhengzhou navigation immediately to the hospital“Students appeal commission”complaints。

　　2011年9月19日，他获得了一份《学生申诉处理结果送达书》，被告知经“学校学生申诉处理委员会”调查(听证)，并经校长办公会研究决定，维持开除学籍决定不变。

19 September 2011，He won a《The students with the result to book》，Was told that the“School students appeal commission”survey(hearing)，And the President BanGongHui decision research，Maintain expelled decided to remain unchanged。

　　2011年9月27日，李放又向河南省教育厅提出申诉，请求撤销郑州航院开除学籍处分决定，但河南省教育厅没有支持李放的诉求。

On September 27, 2011，LiFang and to lodge a complaint to the department of education in henan province，For canceling the zhengzhou air expelled from school to sanctions，But without the support of henan province education department, LiFang appeal。

　　无奈之下，李放选择了将学校起诉至法院。

Helpless under，LiFang chose will school sued to the court。

　　李放的委托代理人、河南规范律师事务所律师李鹏告诉中国青年报记者，他接受委托后，就赶到了郑州航院，想向学校相关部门及教师了解详情。

LiFang proxies、Henan standard lawyer li told the China youth daily reporter，He accepting trust，Arrive to the zhengzhou navigation court，Want to related departments and school teachers for details。

　　结果，他很巧合地发现，李放被开除的决定仍张贴在教学楼里，一起被处分的还有10余人，“我们看了下日期，发现上午考试，下午就张贴了处分决定。我们意识到里面肯定有问题，因为这明显没有给学生留下陈述和申辩的机会，学校肯定有违反程序的地方”。

The results，He is very coincidence to find，LiFang expelled posted in the teaching building is decided，Along with the sanctions have 10 people，“We see the next date，Found morning test，Afternoon posted sanctions decision。We realize that it have a problem for certain，Because this obviously did not give students the opportunity to leave statements and arguments，The school must have against procedures place”。

　　李鹏回去查询资料，发现教育部在2005年发布了《普通高等学校学生管理规定》，其中第五十六条规定：“学校在对学生作出处分决定之前，应当听取学生或其代理人的陈述和申辩”。

Li back inquires the material，Found in 2005, launched the ministry of education《Common higher school students management regulations》，Among them article 56 regulations：“School student make the decision on punishment before，Students or its agent shall hear statements and arguments”。

　　此外，《普通高等学校学生管理规定》还规定：“对有违法、违规、违纪行为的学生，学校应当给予批评教育或者纪律处分。学校给予学生的纪律处分，应当与学生违法、违规、违纪行为的性质和过错的严重程度相适应。”

In addition，《Common higher school students management regulations》Also provides：“To have illegal、illegal、Indiscipline students，The school shall give criticism education or disciplinary action。School gives students' disciplinary action，Students should be illegal、illegal、The nature of the action of discipline and the severity of the fault adaptation。”

　　李鹏认为郑州航院先作出开除决定，后履行相关程序，属于程序违法。

Li think zhengzhou navigation court decision to fire first，Perform the related procedures after，Belong to program illegal。

　　这一辩护意见获得了一审法院的采纳，法院据此要求郑州航院撤销《关于给予李放开除学籍处分的决定》，判决生效之日起十日内恢复原告的学籍。

The defense won opinions of the court of adoption，The court according to this request zhengzhou air courtyard revoked《About giving lee in the decision to release student status sanctions》，The day of the effect of the ruling within ten days of the recovery student status。

　　郑州航院不服，上诉至郑州市中级人民法院。郑州市中级人民法院2012年5月8日作出的二审判决，表示“一审判决结果正确，应予以维持”。

Zhengzhou navigation refuses to court，Appeal to zhengzhou intermediate people's court。Zhengzhou intermediate people's court on May 8, 2012, the judgment to second，said“Verdict result is correct，Should be maintained”。

　　李鹏说，李放的起诉形成了示范效应。在他之后，又有几位同学向郑州航院提起了类似诉讼，其中两起已有判决。

LiPengShui，The prosecution LiFang form the demonstration effect。After his，And some students to zhengzhou filed a similar lawsuit aerospace hospital，Two of them up for judgment。

　　一起是，2011年12月的一次考试中，郑州航院学生张某打开手机看时，被监考老师发现手机信息中有考试相关内容，张某因此被认定为舞弊，被处以开除学籍的处分。

Together is，The December 2011 an exam，Zhengzhou air courtyard students open the phone look zhang，Be examiner found that cell phone information have a test of related content，Zhang mou so is recognized for corruption，Be fined expelled punishment。

　　张某起诉至法院后，郑州航院提交了一份《郑州航院考试违纪情况说明表》，内容为“原告张××在该场考试中，第二次看手机作弊，事先在8点多警告了一次。发现时选择题答案在手机中，正在看，监考老师李××，俞××”。郑州航院还提交了一份张某书写的悔过材料，里面有其“在考试中看了别人给其传的手机短信，还没来得及看短信，就已被老师抓住，对此十分后悔”等内容。然而，法院仍然判决郑州航院败诉。

Zhang sued to the court，Zhengzhou air courtyard submitted a《Zhengzhou air courtyard exam discipline case table》，Content for the“The plaintiff zhang x in the exams，The second time at a mobile phone to cheat，In the more than eight warned a second time。Found the answers on your phone selection，Are watching，The supervisor li x x，Yu x”。Zhengzhou navigation court also submitted a zhang mou of writing materials of repentance，Inside has its“See the other people in the exam for the preaching of the mobile phone short message，Haven't had time to see a message，It has been the teacher caught，Quite regret”Content such as the。however，Court ruling still lose the zhengzhou navigation。

　　法院判决的依据是，郑州航院的《考试违纪情况说明表》所记载内容与原告张某的陈述内容相矛盾的情况下，仅凭其学院监考教师单方面记录的《考试违纪情况说明表》，未经进一步核实，即认定为利用手机作弊行为，由此作出的开除学籍的处分决定“属事实不清，主要证据不足，依法应予撤销”。

The court decision is，Zhengzhou navigation court of the《The exam discipline case table》Recorded content and the plaintiff zhang mou's contradictory statements，Only with the college teachers will unilaterally record《The exam discipline case table》，Without further verification，That is for the use of mobile phones as cheating，This made the decision of punishment expelled from school“Of fact is not clear，Main insufficient evidence，Shall be revoked in accordance with the”。

　　中国青年报记者发现，几起判例中，相关法院都判决了郑州航院败诉。对此，记者联系了郑州航院教务处两位负责人，想了解他们的看法，但两位负责人都拒绝了记者的采访。

China youth daily reporter discovery，Several up in case，All the related court verdict against the zhengzhou navigation。this，Contact the zhengzhou navigation court reporter office of two chief，Want to know about their views，But the two chief refused to the reporter's interview。