同日，“亲子大讲堂”官方微博发起投票“北大教授吴必虎建议男童在7～8岁入学，你同意吗？”目前已有140人投票，选择“强烈同意”的占21.75%；选择“有一定道理，可以考虑”的占27.8%；选择“放开年龄段，6～8岁自由选择”的占比例最多，达42.6%；选择“强烈不同意”的只有5人，占4.3%。

On the same day,"Parent-child lecture hall"The official micro bo launch vote"Peking University professor wu will tiger suggest boy in 7 ~ 8 annual income study,Do you agree with??"There are 140 people to vote,choose"Strongly agree with"Accounted for 21.75%;choose"There is something,Can consider"Accounted for 27.8%;choose"Let go of age,6 ~ 8 years free choice"The proportion of the most,Up to 42.6%;choose"Strong don't agree with"Only five people,4.3%.

　　吴必虎告诉记者，“错龄入学”的出发点是：由于智力发育较女生晚，一部分男生学习跟不上，在小学阶段不受老师重视，心理压力大。他认为，男女智力发育存在“时间差”，现行的成绩评价体系也更有利于女生。男生因为竞争不过女生，可能会失去进一步教育的机会。应该探讨用什么办法避免其发展成严重的社会问题。

Wu will tiger told reporters,"Wrong age entrance"Starting point is:Due to the development of intelligence is the girl late,Part of the boys learn can't keep up,In the elementary school stage from the teacher pay attention to,Psychological pressure.He thinks,Men and women intelligence development exist"Time difference",The current performance appraisal system is more conducive to the girl.The boy because competition but the girl,May lose the opportunity to further education.Should discuss with what way to avoid its development into a serious social problem.

　　而中国教育研究院研究员储朝晖认为，“错龄入学”或者适当放宽7周岁入学的硬性要求，对尊重受教育者个性化发展来说是有益的。此外，还应该探讨建立多元评价体系，更好地服务于人性的发展。(新华)

China education research institute researcher from zhaohui think reservoir,"Wrong age entrance"Or relax appropriately 7 years old entrance of the rigid requirements,To respect educatees individuation development it is useful.In addition,Should also explore to establish multivariate evaluation system,To better serve the development of human nature.(xinhua)