10月10日，本报教育科学版刊发了一篇名为《6年后我将收获怎样一个孩子开学一月摧垮家长坚持6年的教育观》的家长自述。文章写的是一位叫林爻的家长，在孩子上学前，用6年时间力图把女儿培养成“她自己”，告诉她既不妄自菲薄，也不妄自尊大。但是，女儿上小学后的这一个月，几乎快要摧垮这位家长已经坚持了6年的教育观。

On October 10,,The education science edition published a paper named[Six years later I will harvest how a child on January destroy parents insist on six years of education]Parents complain.This article is written by a man named Lin Yao parents,In the children before they go to school,With 6 years trying to her daughter into training"she",Tell her neither improperly belittles oneself,Also stuffy.but,Daughter elementary school after this month,Almost destroy the parents have to the six years of education.

　　这位家长无比担忧地发出了“6年后我将收获怎样一个孩子？”的诘问。

The parents very worry out"Six years later I will harvest how a child?"Cross-examined by the.

　　随着林爻的这一问，该篇报道迅速得到多家媒体的转载，同时在微博上引发了一场声势极大的讨论。

With Yao Lin of the question,This report quickly get many media reprinted,At the same time in micro blog sparked a tremendous great discussion.

　　新浪微博上出现了由这篇文章引发的名为“开学一月毁教育观”的“热门话题”，目前已经有近40万的微博对该篇报道进行了转载和评论，参与讨论的不乏“华西都市网”、“河南新闻广播”、“新闻晨报”、“江苏电视台新闻中心官方微博”、“瞭望周刊社”、“央视新闻评论员集体微博”、“辽沈晚报”、“大连晚报”、“现代快报”、“新浪教育”等新闻媒体的官方微博。

Sina appeared on the micro bo by this article caused by name"On January destroyed education"of"Hot topic",At present there are nearly 400000 micro bo of the report on the transfer and comments,There is no lack of participating in discussions"West China are enterprise"/"Henan news broadcast"/"Morning news"/"Jiangsu TV news center official micro bo"/"Lookout ZhouKanShe"/"CCTV commentators collective micro bo"/"LiaoShen evening news"/"Dalian evening news"/"Modern express"/"Sina education"News media such as the official micro bo.

　　腾讯微博也出现了由“开学一月摧垮家长6年教育观”引发的名为“我们需要什么样的教育”的微讨论。

Tencent micro bo also appeared by"On January destroy parents 6 years education"Cause name"We need what kind of education"Micro discussion.

　　人民网也于10月15日在“滚动新闻”中刊发了由这篇报道引发的网友讨论。

We also on October 15, in"Rolling news"In the published by the report caused by the net friend to discuss.

　　一篇报道在刊登了将近一周之后仍然持续在网络上被转发、讨论、发酵，这在一定程度上反映了人们对教育的关注，同时也反映出当前确实有相当多的家长有着与林爻相同的困惑，正如“央视新闻评论员集体微博”在微博中写的那样：“此信说出了太多家长的心声。小学教育有必要培养孩子的纪律性、服从性和集体意识，但让他们懂得节俭、选择、尊重和被尊重，同样重要。相信这位妈妈学前6年的教育成果不会被这么轻易摧垮。但两种教育观的较量，恐怕将长期存在。什么是‘好小学’？不是牌子硬、校舍好，而是教育观真正够好。”

In a report published nearly a week later continue on the network is forward/discuss/fermentation,This, to a certain extent, reflects the people to the attention of education,At the same time also reflects the current do have quite a number of parents with forest Yao the same confusion,as"CCTV commentators collective micro bo"In micro bo wrote it:"This letter say too many parents heart.Primary school education is necessary to develop the child's sense of discipline/Submissiveness and collective consciousness,But let them know thrift/choose/Respect and be respected,Equally important.Believe the mother preschool six years of education results will not be so easily destroy.But the two kinds of education of the bout,I'm afraid I will exist for a long time.What is‘Good primary school’?Not brand hard/Schoolhouse good,But education really good enough."

　　这样的声音还有很多，“开心球动漫中国官方微博”这样写道：教育孩子应在一定的原则和框架内充分开发和尊重他们的创造力和想象力，而不是制作一个流水线上的产品而已。比如和朋友们玩耍，探索新鲜事物，经历困境和挑战，甚至是出洋相，这些都是孩子成长的必经之路。

Such a voice and a lot of,"Happy ball anime China's official micro bo"wrote:Education child should be in certain principles and framework fully development and respect their creativity and imagination,Instead of making a product line only.For example and play with his friends,Explore new things,Experience difficulties and challenges,Even make a fool of oneself,These are the children to grow up the way.

　　“阳光作家潇竹”在微博上这样表述：“尊重孩子的个性，了解孩子的成长规律，让孩子做最好的自己。老师是园丁，孩子是花朵，每个孩子都是不同的花朵，而非流水线中整齐划一的产品。”

"The sun Xiao writer bamboo"In micro blog this statement:"Respect your child's personality,Understanding a child's growth rule,Let children do your best.The teacher is the gardener,Children are the flowers,Every child is different flowers,Instead of pipeline neat and tidy products."

　　虽然有众多网友支持林爻的观点，但是也有一些人指出，林爻这样的家长太矫情、太脆弱，是家长自身“焦虑情绪的放大，这对孩子的成长并没有好处”。

Although there are numerous net friend support forest Yao point of view,But there are also some people pointed out,Lin Yao such parents too be affectedly unconventional/Too fragile,Is their own parents"Anxiety amplification,This to a child's growth is not good".

　　无论大家是否支持家长林爻的观点，一篇并不长的文章能引起如此热闹的讨论，这一现象本身就说明，家长对当前学校教育种种问题所表现出来的不满已经到了不能不说的地步。

No matter whether we support parents forest Yao point of view,A not long articles can cause such a lively discussion,This phenomenon itself shows that,Parents to the current school education problems have expressed dissatisfaction has come to the point of said.

　　因为，人们看到了林爻所担心的“标准作业本”背后是更为恐怖的“标准答案”。　　

because,People see the forest Yao fear"Standard exercise book"Behind them is more horrible"Standard answer".