浙江省教育厅日前下发通知，建立“教师师德师风专项检查制度”，并将其作为教师资格认定、业绩考核、职称评审等的首要内容，对不合格教师实行“一票否决”。

Zhejiang province education department has issued a notice,To establish"Teachers' ethics of teachers special inspection system",And as a teacher qualification/Performance assessment/Title appraisal and primary content,To implement qualified teachers"One ticket veto".

　　听闻“一票否决”，不禁让人感叹浙江教育部门“从严治师”的决心与力度。时下，公众对一些为人师者的道德风范诟病已久，作为受虐童案触动而产生的制度性成果，师德师风专项检查制度不仅体现了当地主管部门的雷厉风行，也为我们探讨师德师风建设提供了关切的线索。

heard"One ticket veto",Can't help letting person plaint zhejiang education department"Severely division"Determination and efforts.nowadays,The public is to some of the teachers moral leadership has long for,As a battered child case touches and produce institutional results,Ethics of teachers special inspection system reflects not only the local administrative department of high efficiency,Also for us to explore the construction of ethics of teachers provide the clues to concern.

　　从必要性上看，师者，首先应当具备“爱”和“责任”，不在道德品质上率先垂范，会从根本上影响学生的道德养成。很难想象，一个不爱学生的人如何成为合格的老师，没有责任感的人又有何资格去授业解惑。曝光的虐童事件，只是教育失序背景下师德师风建设式微的一个注脚，将道德规范作为老师的职业资格之本，并纳入常态化、制度化的检查监督，无疑具有现实意义。

Look from necessity,teachers,First shall have the"love"and"responsibility",Not in moral quality in the following,Will be fundamentally affect the students' moral cultivation.It is hard to imagine,A love students how to become a qualified teacher,No sense of responsibility person and have any qualification to impart knowledge to reassure.Exposure of child abuse event,Only education disorder under the background of the construction of ethics of teachers the decrepit a footnote,Will ethics as a teacher of the professional qualification,And into the normalization/Institutionalized inspection and supervision,It has practical significance.

　　但用“立法”的眼光看，这样的制度面临着界定不明和执行模糊的困境。任何一项制度，如果不能清晰明确地传递行为规范和准则，就很容易失去约束力。比如，考核项目中有“教师是否认真备课上课、认真批改作业、认真辅导学生”，这里“认真”的具体标准是什么？何种情况算“不认真”？还比如，“是否体罚或变相体罚学生或歧视学生”，这里“体罚”的边界如何把握？与美国《优秀教师行为守则》第一条规定“记住学生姓名”相比，我们的制度设计更易给执行带来诸多不确定性。

But with"legislation"eyes,Such a system is facing define unknown and execute fuzzy dilemma.Any system,If you can't clear clearly transfer behavior standard and criterion,It is easy to lose binding force.For example,Assessment of the project"Whether teachers prepares a lesson earnestly class/Corrects students' papers carefully/Serious students",here"seriously"The specific standard of is what?Circumstances is"No serious"?Still for example,"Whether corporal punishment or corporal punishment in disguised forms students or discriminate against the student",here"Corporal punishment"The boundary of how to grasp?And the United States[Excellent teacher codes of practice]The first rule"Remember the name of the students"Compared with,Our system design are more likely to give executive to bring a lot of uncertainty.

　　用“执法”的眼光看，该制度据称先由学校自查，采取问卷调查、座谈会、教师互评等多种方式，并“听取家长、学生、社会和本校教师的意见和建议”，形成书面报告上报至县(市、区)教育局。在“立法”本已模糊的情况下，如此“执法”更让人担忧。且不说生活中有多少“自查”是“认认真真走过场”，单就“教师互评”和“听取家长、学生意见”两项，就很容易导致分寸尽失。在“削尖脑袋”挤进名校的现实背景下，这种“运动式”检查如何做到客观、中立与公正，显然还缺乏足够的程序保障。

with"Law enforcement"eyes,The system first alleged by the school self-examination,Adopt questionnaire survey/symposium/Leading teachers and so on many kinds of ways,and"Listen to parents/students/Social and school teachers' opinions and Suggestions",Form a written report to the county report(city/area)Education bureau.in"legislation"This has fuzzy cases,so"Law enforcement"More to worry about.Not to mention how much life"self-examination"is"Conscientious go through the motions",Sheet is"Teachers' leading"and"Listen to parents/Students' opinions"two,It is easy to lead to discretion loses all.in"Sharpening head"Squeeze into the reality of school background,this"Movement type"Check how to be objective/Neutral and fair,Obviously still lack of procedure guarantee.

　　受舆论影响，我们不难理解教育部门的治师压力，可是急功近利的心态很难抓出长效的成绩，最终要么走入“运动式治理”的怪圈，要么沦为摆设被底下人的形式主义架空。其实，2008年修订的《中小学教师职业道德规范》，已经设定了爱国守法、爱岗敬业、关爱学生、教书育人、为人师表、终身学习六项规范。我国《教育法》更明确规定了教师“遵守宪法、法律和职业道德”“关心、爱护全体学生，尊重学生人格”“制止有害于学生的行为或者其他侵犯学生合法权益的行为”等义务。与情急之下的制度建立相比，如何将现有规范扎扎实实地予以末端落实，更是政府部门治理的当务之急。（京华时报 评论员 傅达林）

Influence by public opinion,We can understand the education department to teacher pressure,But it is difficult to get rich quick mentality grabbing the long-term results,Final or into"Movement type management"The strange circle of,Either a decoration be servants in general form of socialist overhead.In fact,In 2008, the revised[Primary and middle school teachers' professional ethics],Have set the patriot law-abiding/Likes the hillock being professional/Care for students/Impart knowledge and educate people/Is a teacher by worthy example/Lifelong learning six standard.Our country[education]More clearly stipulates the teacher"Abide by the constitution/The law and professional ethics""care/Love all students,Respect students personality""Stop harmful student behavior or other infringe upon the lawful rights and interests of students' behavior"The obligation such as.And the system building unaided compared,How will the existing standard one step at a time to end implement,Is the government management priority.(Jinghua times FuDaLin commentators)