“鹰式教育”引起争议，孩子不是家长私人财产 "6-under education"controversial,The child is not parents private property

严格教育不等于“饿其体肤” Strict education is not equal to"It always hungry"

　　近日武汉4岁男童王鼎森突然蹿红，因为他在社区徒步比赛中一口气走完了18公里，还将不少大人甩在后面。这完全得益他爸爸的特训手段，即强令每天坚持跑步3000米、经常洗冷水澡。不过，这样的“鹰式教育”也在坊间引起了争议这是对孩子严格教育还是摧残幼小身心。

Recently wuhan 4 years old boy's WangDingSen suddenly leap up is red,Because he was walking game community relief covered 18 km,Many adults will be left behind.This fully benefit his father prior means,Every day that compel running 3000 meters/Often cold shower.but,this"6-under education"Also in the urban caused the dispute this is strictly for children education or vandalize young body and mind.

宠有节制严要得法 Pet temperate strict to do it

　　从“虎妈”、“狼爸”到“鹰爸”，虽然教子方式十分极端，甚至带有明显的暴力和逼迫倾向，但却并非一边倒都是反对声。比如，人民网曾推出《暴雪训练儿子“裸跑”，极限教育方式咋看？》调查，约有52%的网友认同“训练方式需因人而异”，22%的网友表示“孩子身体意志要从小磨炼”。

from"Tiger mother"/"The Wolf dad"to"Eagle dad",Although godson way very extreme,Even with obvious tendency to violence and persecution,But not all leans to the cries of dissent.For example,We have introduced[Blizzard training son"Bare run",Limit education mode zha to see?]survey,About 52% of the net friend identity"The training mode should be vary from person to person",22% of the net friend said"Children will want to body from trial".

　　包括教育工作者在内，有不少人也对那些极端教育方式表示了有条件的肯定。青浦区崧泽学校校长朱国君说，孩子的成长离不开家长给予的必要压力，“威慑”“强令”也是必要的教育方式，中国传统文化中的“棍棒底下出孝子”也有一定的道理，关键是如何“打”才得法，打一次要能管十年、二十年，而不是瞎打乱打。浦东新区海桐小学校长孔宇玮也认为，在当下溺爱孩子成风的社会背景下，有必要用一些别人家严格管教孩子的成功案例提醒年轻的父母，宠爱是要有节制的，当然，过分伤及孩子身心的教育方式更要摈弃。

Including education, workers,Many people also to those who are extreme education ways that the conditional affirmation.Qingpu songze country school principal ZhuGuoJun said,A child's growth cannot leave the parents give the necessary pressure,"deterrence""force"Is also the necessary education mode,In China's traditional culture"Under the club a filial son"Also have their reasons to a certain extent,The key is how to"play"Just do it,A minor can tube ten years/Twenty years,Not blind upset play.Pudong new area pittosporum primary school principals KongYuWei also think,In the present spoiling children common practice of social background,It is necessary to use some other people's house strict discipline children's successful cases remind young parents,Pet is to temperate,Of course,Excessive injury and children body and mind education means more to abandon.

可作参考不可复制 Can not copy for reference

　　不过，法律界人士则大多认为，“鹰式教育”只可参考不可盲目复制。身为父母是否就拥有对孩子苦其心志、饿其体肤的权利？上海福隆律师事务所主任赵卫平说，可能有的家长会觉得，既然自己是孩子的监护人，就可以让孩子做任何大人认为正确的事情，而这恰恰忽略了孩子的独立人格。“孩子不是家长的私人财产。我国的《未成年人保护法》及其他一些相关法律条例中，都对教育的一些基本原则做出了规定，但对家长或监护人的过激行为，目前尚未制定具有惩罚性、可执行性强的条款，以致法律约束力有限。”赵卫平建议，严格教育要有底线，不要等孩子出了意外才引起社会的重视，相关的社会组织应当建立健全监管保障体系，在家长教育方式失当时，为孩子撑起一片明亮的天空。(记者 王蔚 陆梓华）

but,The legal profession (ie lawyers) is most believe,"6-under education"Can only reference not blindly copy.If parents have to the child frustrates/It always hungry right?Shanghai fulong law firm ZhaoWeiPing director said,Some parents might think,Since he was a child's guardian,Can let the child to do any adult think the right thing,And it is just ignore the child's independent personality."The child is not the private property of parents.China's[The law on the protection of minors]And some other related legal rules,Education in some of the basic principles to make the rules,But for parents or guardian aggressive behavior,At present has not enacted with punitive/Enforceability strong clause,So that the legal binding force limited."ZhaoWeiPing Suggestions,Strict education should have the bottom line,Don't wait for the child had an accident just cause social attention,Related social organizations shall establish and perfect the supervision security system,In parents' education mode was lost,For the children it props up a stretch of the bright sky.(Reporter WangWei LiuZiHua)