我国证券市场“新兴加转轨”的基本特征，决定了投资者利益保护工作任务艰巨，意义重大。投资者保护不仅有赖于实体法律制度的完善，也要求在法律程序上，能够公平、公正、及时地解决纠纷。

Our country securities market"Emerging and transition"The basic characteristics of,Determine the investors interests protection work task,Is of great significance.Investor protection entity depends not only on the perfection of legal system,The law also requires the program,To be fair/justice/In time to resolve the dispute.

　　作为一项新兴制度，证券纠纷调解与司法诉讼等现有的纠纷解决机制如何实现相互对接，功能互补，成为一项亟待研究的新问题。法律规定调解协议具有民事合同性质，当事人可向法院申请司法确认，经确认后的调解协议具有强制执行力。这是调诉对接最基本的法律规则。协会的有关办法也原则性地规定，“积极与仲裁委员会、法院以及其他纠纷解决机构建立协作关系，推动建立联合调解、调诉对接、调仲对接机制”。在实践中，司法机关和行业组织积极探索诉前引导当事人选择行业调解，实现调诉分流；诉讼中邀请或委托行业调解组织参与案件调解；在执行环节促成执行和解等形式多样的调诉对接模式，积累了丰富经验。

As a new system,Securities dispute mediation and judicial proceedings existing dispute resolution mechanism how to realize mutual butt,Function complementary,To become a new problem.Conciliation agreement law have the nature of civil contract,The parties to the court for judicial confirmation,After the confirmation of the mediation agreement is compulsory execution.This is the most basic tone v. butt of rule of law.The way of the association and the provisions of principle,"Positive and arbitration commission/The court and other dispute resolution mechanism to establish cooperation relations,Promote the establishment of a joint mediation/Adjustable v. butt/Adjustable secondary docking mechanism".In practice,The judicial authorities and industry organizations actively explore before an action guide the parties to choose industry mediation,Realize adjustable v. shunt;Lawsuit invited or entrust industry mediation organizations to participate in mediation case;In performing link to implement reconciliation and various forms of adjustable v. butt mode,Accumulated rich experience.

　　当然，由于证券纠纷调解制度尚处初创阶段，无论是调解组织还是司法机关，在调诉对接的运行流程、工作程序等方面，都还缺少成熟的具体工作制度。同时，由于调解协议不具有强制执行力，当事人申请法院确认和强制执行，面临不确定性。这在一定程度上降低了证券纠纷调解的制度价值和对当事人的吸引力。

Of course,The stock dispute mediation system is still in the initial stage,Whether mediation organizations or judicial organs,In the adjustment of the process of the lawsuit butt/Working procedures, etc,Are still lack of mature specific working system.At the same time,Due to the mediation agreement is not compulsory execution,If the parties apply for court recognition and enforcement,Face uncertainty.This, to a certain extent, reduce the securities dispute mediation system value and the appeal of the parties.

　　针对上述问题，建议从以下几个方面进一步完善调诉对接制度，发挥其在矛盾纠纷解决中的枢纽作用，促进证券纠纷调解工作的发展。

In view of the above questions,Suggestions from the following several aspects to further improve adjustable v. docking system,Use of the contradiction of the dispute resolution hub role,To promote the development of securities dispute mediation work.

　　首先应当充分发挥协会的牵头作用，加强与司法机关的沟通联系。

First of all should give full play to the lead role of the association,To strengthen the judicial organ of the communication.

　　其次，调解工作必须严守中立，高度重视调解协议的质量。调解制度的真谛是“定纷止争、案结事了”。

secondly,Mediation work must be strictly neutral,Attaches great importance to the quality of the conciliation agreement.The essence of mediation system is"The inferno/Case "things".

　　第三，协会作为证券行业的自律组织，对会员有纪律处分的权力。

The third,The securities industry association as the self-discipline organization,To members have the disciplinary power.

　　从长远来看，为了促进调诉对接工作的规范化、制度化和法治化；协会可以争取由证监会在条件成熟时，与最高人民法院共同发文，对证券纠纷的调诉对接制度加以规定。其次，在审判工作中，充分发挥调解组织的作用，使调解机制嵌入到案件审理的全流程中。第三、明确调解协议在证据法上的效力。当事双方在调解过程形成的无争议事实、观点，并记载于调解协议的，可以直接作为证据使用，一般不在诉讼过程中再次组织举证、质证。

In the long run,In order to promote the standardization of the adjustable v. butt/Institutionalization and legalization;Association for the securities regulatory commission in the conditions are ripe,The supreme people's court and the common outgoing mail,The securities dispute lawsuit system is the key to butt is regulated.secondly,In judicial work,Give full play to the role of mediation organization,Make mediation mechanism into the trial of cases of all process.The third/Clear the conciliation agreement in the validity of evidence law.Both parties in the mediation process form without the facts of the dispute/view,And recorded in the conciliation agreement,Can be directly used as evidence,In the process of the proceedings are usually not again of organization/confrontation.