日前，张作霖之孙张闾实称，2007年之前人教社高中历史教材中张作霖的照片实为湖南督军何海清的照片。人民教育出版社历史组徐姓主任表示，此前在网络上看到过关于用错照片的信息，但现在的历史书已经改版，照片已经删除。收录张作霖这张照片的教材版本较老，其来源还需找到当时的主编，才能做进一步判定。(1月17日《东方早报》)

recently,Zhang zuolin grandson of Zhang Lvshi said,Before high school history teaching material of pep 2007 photographs of Peiping is hunan overseers He Haiqing's photo.The people's education press history team Xu Xing director said,Previously seen in the network information about used the wrong photo,But now the history of the book has been revised,Photos have been deleted.Included in Peiping older textbook version of this photo,Still need to find the source editor at that time,Can make further decision.(On January 17,[The Oriental morning post])

　　虽然人民教育出版社相关人士回应称历史书已经改版，照片已经删除，但我们不无遗憾的发现，近年来，教科书中各类错误频出，图书配错照片“闹乌龙”的情况并不鲜见。不久之前，还曾发生一起《林语堂英译精品》文集封面误用作家杨骚照片的情况。更离谱的是，河南一名教师曾在小学语文课本里纠出68处错，四年后的修订版却仍有43处错，不少是他曾指出过的。如此一错再错，又有谁能相信，教科书都是严格考据编写出来的呢？

Although people's education press related people responded history book had been replaced,Photos have been deleted,But we are sorry to find,In recent years,All kinds of error using textbooks,Books with wrong picture"bug"The case is not rare.Not long ago,Had happened[Lin yutang English translation]Anthology cover misuse writer Yang SAO.More ridiculous is,A teacher in the elementary school Chinese textbook, henan out mistakes in 68,Four years after the revision but there are still mistakes in 43,A lot is that he has pointed out.Such a wrong again wrong,And who can believe it,Textbooks are strictly textual research written?

　　教材的重要性不必多言，之于学生的意义，并不仅是普通的书籍，教材中的内容会成为一种常识和固有的知识框架而被不假思索接受下来。由此出发，这些常识成为我们认知世界的起点和原点。

The importance of teaching material don't need to say more,The meaning of the students,Not just ordinary books,The contents of the textbooks will become a kind of common sense and the inherent knowledge framework and is automatically accepted.In view,These common sense to be our starting point and the origin of cognitive world.

　　然而这些年教材出现的种种失误，却让人瞠目结舌。更令人遗憾的是，相关出版社要么对这些质疑不予回应，要么就是以“差错在所难免”、“我们一直在改进”等言辞推脱。

However, over the years teaching material errors,Yet eye-popping.More sadly,Associated Press either of these questions to respond,Or to"Mistakes are inevitable"/"We have been improved"Words such as push to take off.

　　教材出错并非小事。出错可能源于编撰者水平不够或者不严谨，但容忍犯错误并不等于容忍错误。宽容的底线应该是承认错误并及时更正，而不是退化成对错误视而不见的“好好先生“。正如有论者指出，马虎草率、不负责任的态度，比错误本身更贻害无穷。(桂子)

Material error is not a trivial matter.Error may be due to modernizations level or not rigorous enough,But to tolerate mistakes is not to tolerate mistakes.Tolerance of bottom line should be admitting mistakes and corrected in time,Not degenerate pairs wrong to turn a blind eye"A good Sir".As there are theorists pointed out,Careless hasty/Irresponsible attitude,More truculent than the mistake itself.(The laurel blossoms filled the air.)