民事诉讼法修正案有望在近日尘埃落定。自本周一（8月27日）开始，十一届全国人大常委会第二十八次会议在北京人民大会堂举行。根据会议议程，本次常委会会议继续审议民事诉讼法修正案草案、农业技术推广法修正案草案、精神卫生法草案等。

The civil procedure law amendment is expected to dust settled in recently。Since Monday（August 27,）Began to，The first session of the 11th National People's Congress (NPC) in the 28th meeting held in Beijing's great hall of the people。According to the agenda，The standing committee meeting continue to review the amendment of the civil procedure law、Agricultural technology promotion act amendment draft、Mental health law draft, etc。

　　经过两次审议，民事诉讼法已基本定型，不过草案三审稿的新内容仍然引人关注。据了解，本次三审稿明确了根据各地情况确定小额诉讼标的额；对申请再审的审级增加了规定。

After two deliberation，The civil procedure law has basic finalize the design，But the draft three reviewing new content still attract attention。It is understood，The three copy-editor made clear according to the regional situation to determine small action bid；To apply for a retrial level of trial increase the rules。

　　“由于各地发展不平衡，如果直接去量化各地的小额诉讼标的额显得比较困难，一刀切的方式对于经济欠发达地区来讲也不是太公平，而采取差额方式，有一定的积极意义。”北京市恒方永圆律师事务所主任王良斌律师在接受《每日经济新闻(博客,微博)》记者采访时表示。

“All because of unbalanced development，If go directly to quantitative around the small action is drawn to appear more difficult，One size fits all way to undeveloped areas terms also is not too fair，By way of balance，Have positive significance。”Beijing constant FangYong circle law firm lawyers in WangLiangBin director to accept《Daily economic news(blog,Micro bo)》A reporter to interview said。

　　小额诉讼所涉及到的案件金额相对较小，程序更加简易，三审稿的标的额将会再次调整，由二审稿的1万以下修改为“各省、自治区、直辖市上年度就业人员年平均工资30%以下”，从一个一刀切的绝对数值变为根据各地情况的相对数值。

Small proceedings relating to the case of the relatively small amount，Program more simple，Three going over manuscripts bid will be adjusted again，Going over manuscripts by two below 10000 for modification“provinces、Autonomous region、Municipalities directly under the previous year the employment of year of average wage 30% below”，From a a "one size fits all" absolute value to according to the regional situation of relative value。

　　北大法学院教授潘剑锋认为，标的额的修改更有针对性，更符合各地的实际情况。对于小额诉讼采用一审终审的形式，社会反映褒贬不一。潘剑锋认为，过去小额诉讼两级终审时间长，现在小额诉讼实行一审终审制度将更有利于提高诉讼效率。

Peking University law school professor PanJianFeng think，Bid changes more specific，More accord with the actual condition of each district。For small action of first instance in the form of the final appeal，Social reflect mixed。PanJianFeng think，The past small litigation two levels of the long time，Now a small action of the system will be more conducive to improving the efficiency of lawsuit。

　　对此王良斌律师认为，从法院角度来讲，采取这种方式确实可以起到提高审判效率的作用，但也会带来一定的负面效应，比如当事人申诉权利的丧失。王良斌告诉记者，小额诉讼所涉及到的基本上都是跟老百姓日常生活有关的案件，因此，在此次民事诉讼法修订之后，应该注重基层民事诉讼的公平公正问题。

This WangLiangBin lawyer thought，From the court perspective，Take this way can really play a role to improve the efficiency of the trial，But also can bring some negative effect，Such as the loss of the right to appeal。WangLiangBin told reporters，Small action involved are basically with People's Daily life related cases，therefore，In the civil procedure law after revision，Should pay attention to basic civil lawsuit fair question。