在所谓自由的西方市场中，中资企业的投资进程走得异常艰辛。除三一关联企业罗尔斯公司外，华为、中兴也在美遇挫，美方给出的理由同样是“威胁国家安全”。

The so-called freedom in the western market,Chinese-invested enterprises investment process go abnormal hardships.In addition to trinity affiliated enterprise rawls outside the company,huawei/Zte also in YuCuo beauty,The reason is also given"Threaten national security".

　　美国大选进入白热化之际，奥巴马频频祭出“中国牌”，使得三一集团美国风电项目诉讼案越发受到国内外的关注，这场诉讼的前景如何？对于中国企业进军国际市场有何意义？在以“国家安全”为遮羞布的新型贸易壁垒下，中国企业如何应对？

American election in the white-hot,Obama has repeatedly offering out"China brand",Makes the trinity group the United States wind power project lawsuit at home and abroad more attention,The prospect of this case?For Chinese enterprises into the international market has any meaning?in"National security"For the FIG leaf of the new trade barriers next,Chinese enterprises how to deal with?

　　在一个法治国家，用法律的手段解决问题应该是最好的选择。

In a country under the rule of law,By means of the law to solve the problem should be the best choice.

　　——中国跨国诉讼专家郝俊波

- China international litigation HaoJunBo experts

　　奥巴马在选战中拿中国开刀、拿中国有代表性的企业开刀，很可能触发“寒蝉效应”。

Obama campaign in take China operation/Take China representative enterprise operation,Is likely to trigger"Chilling effect".

　　——中国社会科学院美国研究所教授张国庆

- the Chinese academy of social sciences institute of the United States ZhangGuoQing professor

　　三一之所以拿起法律的武器来维护自身权益，是基于对美国司法公平、公正的信心。我相信美方会做出一个聪明的选择。

Trinity is take legal weapon to protect their rights,The United States is based on judicial fairness/Fair confidence.I believe that the United States will make a wise choice.

　　——三一集团副总经理、罗尔斯公司首席执行官吴佳梁

- the trinity group deputy general manager/Rawls WuJiaLiang chief executive officer of the company

　　法律程序

Legal procedures

　　下月美国当地法院将召开听证会

Next month the local court will hold hearings

　　三一集团美国风电项目诉讼案已经引发国际社会关注，半个月来，先后有数十家媒体对该事件进行了报道。

Trinity group the United States wind power project case has sparked international attention,Half a month to,There have been dozens of media to the event has carried on the report.

　　据三一集团美国风电项目诉讼案代理律师夏廷康介绍，这是外国在美投资委员会（CFIUS）成立以来，外国公司第一次对该机构提起诉讼，是史无前例的。

According to trinity group the United States attorney lawsuit wind power project XiaTingKang is introduced,This is the foreign investment commission in the United States(CFIUS)Since the establishment of the,Foreign companies for the first time the agency a lawsuit,Is unprecedented.

　　中国跨国诉讼专家郝俊波介绍，根据美国的诉讼程序，一个案件在进入实体的审理之前，往往会有一些双方的往来，被告可以提起一个动议，申请法院来解散这个案子。“我们估计被告在这个月底就可以提起申请解散的动议，而法院可能会在11月底以前初步裁定，所以可能很快就会有一个阶段性的成果，但是如果这个案子最终法院决定审理，时间可能会比较长，现在不好预测。”

China international litigation experts HaoJunBo is introduced,According to the American procedure,A case of the entity in the trial before,Often there will be some both exchanges,The defendant may filed a motion,Apply for the court to dismiss this case."We estimate that the defendant is at the end of the month may bring the application for dissolution of the motion,But the court may in the preliminary decision until the end of November,So may soon there will be a gradual achievement,But if the case final court decided to trial,Time may be longer,Now bad prediction."

　　夏廷康透露，11月28日，美国当地法院将就此案召开听证会，要解决的是一个关键性问题：美国总统奥巴马下达的命令受不受司法审查。他预计听证会之后，法官可能很快就会做出决定，之后双方都有可能提出上诉。整个过程可能需要3到6个月，这在美国的诉讼实践中算是相当快的。

XiaTingKang revealed,On November 28,,The local court case will hold hearings,To solve is a key problem:President barack Obama issued by the command from judicial review.He is expected to after the hearing,The judge may soon will make a decision,After both sides may appeal.The whole process may take 3 to 6 months,This action in the United States in practice is quite fast.

　　案件分析

Case analysis

　　“美方行为已经违反自己国家法律”

"The United States behavior has violates their national laws"

　　三一集团此次在美起诉美国总统，依据的是美国宪法及行政法条。商务部国际贸易经济合作研究院研究员梅新育认为，美国方面的行为已经违反了美国自己的法律，也违反了国际法。

Trinity group in the prosecution of the President of the United States,Based on the constitution of the United States and administrative law.The ministry of commerce international trade and economic cooperation research institute researcher MeiXinYu think,The United States behaviour has violated the U.S. law,Also violated the international law.

　　“具体来说，美方行为违反了中美两国上世纪80年代签署的双边投资保护协定。”梅新育说，根据这一点，如果三一集团方面觉得有必要的话，我国政府已经可以就此与美方展开外交交涉。但是否真正实施外交交涉，首先取决于三一集团应诉维权整体战略。而且这样一起案例将不可避免地给正在谈判的中美新投资保护协定制造障碍。

"specifically,The United States behavior violates the two countries signed between China and the United States in the 1980 s the bilateral investment protection agreement."MeiXinYu said,According to this,If the trinity group aspects think it is necessary,Our government has can end with the United States launched the diplomatic negotiations.But really implement diplomatic negotiations,First depends on the trinity group appearance rights overall strategy.And such cases together will inevitably give talks between China and the United States are the new investment protection agreement manufacturing obstacles.

　　诉讼前景

Litigation prospect

　　案件可能被驳回，但也有胜诉希望

The case may be rejected,But there are also recover hope

　　日前，美国财政部发言人在回答涉及此案的问题时说，他们认为三一肯定会败诉，因为CFIUS本身有一个规定，总统的有关行政命令不受宪法的司法审查，不受违宪的司法审查。但是，三一方面仍旧表示，对该案的诉讼前景充满信心。

a,Us Treasury spokesman in answer to the problems involved in the case said,They think the trinity will surely lose,Because CFIUS itself has a regulation,The President's relevant administrative orders from the constitution judicial review,Don't be unconstitutional judicial review.but,Three hand still said,In the case of the litigation prospects are full of confidence.

　　郝俊波预测，这个案子的前景会比较艰难。他认为，奥巴马作为一个尚在任期内的美国总统，他所做出的决定一般不会受到美国的司法审查，所以，很有可能这个案件从程序上就会被驳回。但郝俊波同时表示，从法理来讲，这个案子也存在胜诉的希望，因为美国原则上是一个三权分立的国家。“作为律师，我多年的从业经验告诉我，那些穿着西装的律师和穿着法官袍的法官，首先是一个活生生的人，并不是一个法律机器，所以最终影响这个案件的也许是法官有关的价值观或他们自己的生活体验。”

HaoJunBo prediction,The prospect of the case will have a tough time.He thinks,Obama as a President of the United States is in period,His decisions normally are not American judicial review,so,Very likely the case from the program will be rejected.But HaoJunBo also said,Will tell from legal principle,In this case, there are also the hope of winning,Because the United States in principle is a separation of the country."As a lawyer,My years of experience told me,Those who wear a suit of lawyers and judges in the judge robe,The first is a living person,Is not a legal machine,So finally affect the case may be the judge about values or their own life experience."

　　夏廷康认为，由于涉及“国家安全”这一敏感话题，本身要打赢这个案子确实存在着一定的难度，但他相信在美国这样一个法治社会，没有人能够把自己凌驾于宪法之上，“美国总统不是例外，在安全领域里面也不会是例外。”

XiaTingKang think,Because it involves a"National security"This sensitive topic,Itself to win the case there is certain difficulty,But he believes in the us such a society ruled by law,No one can take their outmatch above the constitution,"The President of the United States is not exception,In the security field is also is not exception."

　　夏廷康说，三一集团和罗尔斯公司不是有意选择奥巴马作为起诉对象，而是因为风电项目最后被禁止的这个命令是由奥巴马总统签署的，法律上来讲就是，奥巴马是天然的当事人。在中国人看来，起诉美国总统这件事似乎很高调，事实上，对美国这样一个法治国家而言，老百姓告总统和企业告总统，都不是第一次。

XiaTingKang said,Trinity group and rawls company didn't mean to choose Obama as a charged object,But because of wind power project finally banned this command is by Obama signed by the President,Legal terms is,Barack Obama is a natural party.For Chinese people,Sue the President of the United States it seems very sharp,In fact,For the United States in such a country under the rule of law,People against the President and enterprise against the President,Is not the first time.

　　[分析]

[analysis]

　　“国家安全”成为贸易新壁垒

"National security"Become a new trade barriers

　　近年来，中资企业在美投资、收购、销售、承包等行为在已符合当地法规、通过技术检测等前提下，投资仍屡次受阻。从反倾销、反补贴到技术壁垒、绿色壁垒，再上升到国家安全层面“考量”下的“禁用”，美国贸易保护主义有愈演愈烈之势。

In recent years,Chinese-invested enterprises in the investment/acquisition/sales/Contract behavior in already in conformity with local codes/Through the technical detection and premise,Investment is still often hindered.From the anti-dumping/Countervailing to technical barriers/Green barriers,Go to the national security level"considerations"of"disable",The American trade protectionism are called-are.

　　“根本不需要实质‘威胁’动作，只要美方认为你有威胁的能力，你就是‘威胁’了。”中国社会科学院世经所所长肖炼直言。“国家安全只是美方对外宣称的借口”。商务部国际贸易经济合作研究院副院长邢厚媛指出，其背后的真正目的有政治和经济两方面。

"Don't need essence‘threat’action,As long as the us think you have the ability to threat,You are‘threat’the."The Chinese academy of social sciences ShiJingSuo director XiaoLian the truth."National security is declared the United States an excuse".The ministry of commerce international trade and economic cooperation research institute, vice President of the XingHouYuan pointed out,The real purpose of behind the political and economic two aspects.

　　邢厚媛称，政治方面，一方面，中美两国存在意识形态的差异，美国看待中国大型企业经常戴着有色眼镜，例如美众议院称华为、中兴威胁其国家安全，尽管华为、中兴是民营企业，其较大的发展规模仍让美国感到“不安全”；另一方面，目前恰逢美国大选，打“中国牌”争取选票也是重要原因。

XingHouYuan says,politics,On the one hand,China and the United States exist differences of ideology,The United States look at China's large enterprise often wear colored glasses,For example, the house of representatives called huawei beauty/Zte threat to the national security,Although huawei/Zte is private enterprise,The large scale of development of the still let the United States felt"unsafe";On the other hand,At present the attention of the election,play"China brand"Get the votes are also important reasons.

　　经济方面，之前美国对中国制造的“畏惧”还限于劳动密集型产品，而华为、中兴的发展让其看到了中国企业在更高级如通信技术领域发展的竞争力。对于来自技术含量高的产业的竞争，一般的反倾销、反补贴等贸易救济措施抑制效果有限，且有世界贸易组织争端解决机制制约，相比之下，以“国家安全”为由具有美国单方面“一票确认”的特征，能更容易更简单地把美国不愿接受的产业挡在国门之外。

economic,Before the United States to China"fear"Still limited to labor-intensive products,And huawei/The development of zte make them see the Chinese enterprise in more senior such as communication technology development competitiveness.For high technical content from the industry competition,General anti-dumping/Countervailing and trade relief measures inhibiting effect limited,And the world trade organization dispute settlement mechanism restriction,Compared with,to"National security"With the United States on the unilateral"A ticket confirmation"characteristics,Can be more easy to more simply put the United States is not willing to accept industry to stand in the outside doors.

　　事实上，以“威胁国家安全”为理由阻止中国企业进入美国市场已经发生过多次。资料显示，近年来，中国公司在美投资屡屡遭遇“安全问题”，中海油并购优尼科公司、华为并购三叶公司等并购案最终都以失败告终。“可以说，这种威胁国家安全的借口已成为一个非市场壁垒，甚至可能成为又一贸易保护措施。”邢厚媛表示。

In fact,to"Threaten national security"For reason for Chinese enterprises to enter the United States market have occurred many times.Data shows,In recent years,Chinese companies in the United States often encounter investment"Safety problems",Cnooc m&a unocal corporation/Huawei m&a trefoil company deal finally ended in failure."Can say,This kind of threat to national security excuse has become a non-market barriers,May even become another trade protection measures."XingHouYuan said.

　　如此背景下，中国国际贸易学会中美欧研究中心共同主任何伟文表示，希望中国企业不要因类似事件对美国市场心生惧意，而应考虑采取迂回的措施进入美国市场。比如与在美国境内有市场地位的合作伙伴结盟，学习联想和IBM的合作模式进行发展；或抓住美国地方政府希望提升就业率的心理，参与地方项目。

So background,The China association of international trade research center director of the us and Europe in common HeWeiWen said,Hope that Chinese enterprises don't because of the similar events on the American market heart afraid of life meaning,And should consider indirect measures into the American market.For example and in the United States have the market position of alliance partners,Learning association and IBM cooperation pattern of development;Or seize the American local government to improve employment psychology,Participate in local project.

　　邢厚媛也建议中国企业，在进入美国较发达市场时，在坚持市场为导向的原则下，运用媒体、中介机构等加强与当地政府、企业的公共关系，以求更和谐发展。

XingHouYuan also suggested that Chinese enterprises,In the United States more developed market,In adhering to market-oriented principle,Use media/Intermediary agencies to strengthen and the local government/Enterprise's public relations,In order to more harmonious development.

　　综合《工人日报》《国际商报》报道

comprehensive[Workers' daily,][International business]reports

　　[观点]

[view]

　　国际规则中，要敢于“让你疼”

International rules,Dare to"Let you pain"

　　在遭遇CFIUS的阻挠之后，三一关联企业罗尔斯公司不仅没有“知难而退”，反而在收到总统行政令之后，将美国总统告上法庭，此举在国际上备受瞩目，也为中国企业维护自身合法权益提供了经验。

In the face of CFIUS after block,Trinity affiliated enterprise rawls company not only"Shrink back from difficulties",But in the received the President after the administrative order,Will the President of the United States to court,The move in the world which is attracting lots of attention,Also for Chinese enterprises to maintain their legal rights and provides experience.

　　作为长期代理国际诉讼的律师，郝俊波认为：“这起案件不仅关系到每个走出国门的中国企业的切身利益，而且对美国自身的法制，都会有一个非常重大的意义。因为美国是实行判例法的一个典型国家。”

As long-term agent international litigation lawyer,HaoJunBo think:"The case is not only related to each go abroad the vital interests of Chinese enterprises,The United States itself and the legal system,Will have a very important significance.Because the United States is a case law of a typical countries."

　　中国社会科学院美国研究所教授张国庆认为，三一此举是做了非常好的表率，为中国企业走出去创造了一个条件。“从国际游戏规则来说，从来没有一种一方永不说‘不’的关系可以长期维持健康和协调，在国家关系中，‘让你疼’也是为了保护这个关系，从这个角度来说，三一此举有利于保护和改善中美经贸关系。”张国庆表示，三一这次等于是给大家上了一堂公开课，就是中国企业要赢得更多国际话语权，但话语权的取得和巩固是一个艰辛的过程。

The Chinese academy of social sciences institute of American professor ZhangGuoQing think,Trinity the move is made very good example,For Chinese enterprises to go out to create a condition."For from the international rules of the game,Never a party never say‘Don't’Long-term relationship can maintain health and coordination,In international relations,‘Let you pain’And in order to protect the relationship,From this point of view,Trinity this help protect and improve sino-us economic and trade relations."ZhangGuoQing said,Trinity this and give you a lesson on open class,Is the Chinese enterprise to win more international discourse right,But the right to obtain and consolidate is a difficult process.